{"title":"核液-气相变","authors":"D. Boal","doi":"10.1063/1.34926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calculations of the equation of state of nuclear matter strongly suggest the existence of a liquid‐gas phase transition. However, how sharp the transition will appear in finite nuclei, and what the experimental signatures will be are questions which evoke considerable debate. The current status of these issues, particularly the experimental signature ambiguities, is reviewed here.","PeriodicalId":240164,"journal":{"name":"Intersections Between Particles and Nuclear Physics","volume":"247 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nuclear liquid‐gas phase transition\",\"authors\":\"D. Boal\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.34926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calculations of the equation of state of nuclear matter strongly suggest the existence of a liquid‐gas phase transition. However, how sharp the transition will appear in finite nuclei, and what the experimental signatures will be are questions which evoke considerable debate. The current status of these issues, particularly the experimental signature ambiguities, is reviewed here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intersections Between Particles and Nuclear Physics\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intersections Between Particles and Nuclear Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersections Between Particles and Nuclear Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calculations of the equation of state of nuclear matter strongly suggest the existence of a liquid‐gas phase transition. However, how sharp the transition will appear in finite nuclei, and what the experimental signatures will be are questions which evoke considerable debate. The current status of these issues, particularly the experimental signature ambiguities, is reviewed here.