非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者:一个具有挑战性的群体

Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira
{"title":"非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者:一个具有挑战性的群体","authors":"Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira","doi":"10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.","PeriodicalId":427707,"journal":{"name":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonobese Patients With Obstrutive Sleep Apnea (OSA):A Challenging Group\",\"authors\":\"Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种未被诊断的疾病,影响生活质量(QoL)。对非肥胖患者(NOP)的生理病理及治疗效果认识不足。目的:比较NOP和肥胖患者(OP)的OSA症状和严重程度、CPAP依从性问题、治疗效果、合并症和生活质量。方法:对某中心医院呼吸睡眠门诊就诊的患者进行回顾性研究。从临床记录中收集患者的人口统计学、合并症和治疗效果的数据。通过电话访谈评估CPAP依从性和生活质量问题。比较OP(BMI=30kg/m2)与NOP的差异。结果:117例患者中,男性占62%,平均年龄64岁,67%为op。多数OP和NOP存在中重度OSA(分别为73%和66%,p=0.47)和心血管合并症(86%OP和69%NOP分别有2例合并症,p=0.03)。NOP使用更多催眠药物(44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04),对CPAP治疗的依从性较低(>70%使用天数>4小时:47%vs 56%, p=0.3),并且CPAP治疗的残留AHI较高(残留AHI结论:NOP合并OSA治疗具有挑战性:它们的严重程度、发病率与op相似,对治疗的依从性较低。一旦OSA治疗改善生活质量,促进CPAP依从性和替代疗法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonobese Patients With Obstrutive Sleep Apnea (OSA):A Challenging Group
Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信