完全展开管流高雷诺数时速度分布与摩擦系数的关系

N. Furuichi, Y. Terao, Y. Wada, Y. Tsuji
{"title":"完全展开管流高雷诺数时速度分布与摩擦系数的关系","authors":"N. Furuichi, Y. Terao, Y. Wada, Y. Tsuji","doi":"10.1615/tsfp10.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pipe flow, which is one of the canonical wall-bounded flows, finds wide application in engineering fields. Because knowledge of the physics of pipe flow is very important to achieve effective fluid transport, many studies on fully developed turbulent pipe flow have been performed since the early 1900s. However, even the functional form for the mean velocity profile remains incomplete because of the Reynolds number effect, as summarized by Kim (2012). One of the reason for the inconsistency of the velocity profile formulae is that the wall shear stress used for the scaling of the velocity profile is also inconsistent among previous experiments. Obtaining the wall shear stress (or equivalently the friction factor) is important for not only pipe flows but also for wall-bounded flows in general. The second reason of the inconsistency is the Reynolds number dependency of the velocity profile formula. As investigated in other type of the wall bounded flows, boundary layer and channel flow, the constants in the velocity profile formula are influenced by Reynolds number. To discuss the universality of the velocity profile, the pipe flow experiments at higher Reynolds number region is required. In this paper, new experimental results for the friction factor and the velocity profile at high Reynolds number up to 10 are presented. The Reynolds number dependency of the constants in the formulae of the friction factor and the velocity profile are discussed using the experimental result. Furthermore, to show the reliability of the experimental results, the higher level consistency of the measurement data between the friction factor and velocity profile is presented. In this experiments, the Hi-Reff (High Reynolds number actual flow facility) (Furuichi et al, 2009) was used. The working fluids in this facility is water. The feature of this facility is high Reynolds number and high accurate flowrate measurement. The maximum Reynolds number based on diameter of pipe is ReD=2×10 (based on friction velocity, Reτ=3×10). The flow rate is measured by the static gravimetric method or the reference flowmeters calibrated by the weighing tank. The uncertainty of the flow rate ranges from 0.060% to 0.10% with the coverage factor of k=2. The velocity profile was measured by using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). The examined Reynolds number ranges ReD=3.9×10 1.1×10 (Reτ=1.0×10 – 2.1×10). The friction factor is obtained by the measurement of the pressure drop between two pressure taps installed in smooth pipes with D=100 mm and 387 mm. The examined Reynolds number for the friction factor measurement ranges ReD=7.1×10 1.8×10 (Reτ=2.3×10 – 2.7×10). The detail of experimental results are shown in the reference (Furuichi et al., 2015). Using the experimental results, the Reynolds number dependence of the Kármán and the additive constants (κ and B respectively) is investigated as shown in the figure. The behaviors of both constants are found to change at approximately ReD=3×10 5×10. Both constants vary in the bulk Reynolds number region ReD<5 × 10 (Reτ<10) and remain invariant at values of κ=0.383 and B=4.335 with changing Reynolds number for ReD>5×10 (Reτ>10). The consistency between the velocity profile and the friction factor is investigated by integrating the velocity profile data. The velocity profile data are fitted by the log law, and the equation for the friction factor is derived by integrating the fitted equation of the velocity profile. This friction factor equation is found to suitably represent the friction factor data, with the equation deviating from the friction by less than 1%. This analysis indicates that the friction factor for 10<ReD<10 cannot be expressed by a unique equation for the velocity profile based on the log law because the Kármán and the additive constants have Reynolds number dependence at low Reynolds numbers (ReD<3×10). At high Reynolds numbers (ReD>5×10), the friction factor can be expressed by a unique equation, which yields κ=0.383 and B=4.335. This friction factor behavior is consistent with the behavior of the constants in the mean velocity profile. REFERENCES Kim, J., “Progress in pipe and channel flow turbulence, 1961-2011”, Journal of Turbulence, 13, 45, 1-19, (2012) Furuichi, N., Sato, H., Terao, Y. and Takamoto, M., “A New Calibration Facility of Flowrate for High Reynolds Number”, Flow Meas. Inst. 20-1, 38-47 (2009) Furuichi, N., Terao, Y., Wada Y. and Tsuji, Y., “Friction factor and mean velocity profile for pipe flow at high Reynolds numbers”, Physics of Fluids, 27, 095108 (2015), 104 105 106 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41","PeriodicalId":266791,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Tenth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation between Velocity Profile and Friction Factor at High Reynolds Number in Fully Developed Pipe Flow\",\"authors\":\"N. Furuichi, Y. Terao, Y. Wada, Y. Tsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/tsfp10.1100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pipe flow, which is one of the canonical wall-bounded flows, finds wide application in engineering fields. Because knowledge of the physics of pipe flow is very important to achieve effective fluid transport, many studies on fully developed turbulent pipe flow have been performed since the early 1900s. However, even the functional form for the mean velocity profile remains incomplete because of the Reynolds number effect, as summarized by Kim (2012). One of the reason for the inconsistency of the velocity profile formulae is that the wall shear stress used for the scaling of the velocity profile is also inconsistent among previous experiments. Obtaining the wall shear stress (or equivalently the friction factor) is important for not only pipe flows but also for wall-bounded flows in general. The second reason of the inconsistency is the Reynolds number dependency of the velocity profile formula. As investigated in other type of the wall bounded flows, boundary layer and channel flow, the constants in the velocity profile formula are influenced by Reynolds number. To discuss the universality of the velocity profile, the pipe flow experiments at higher Reynolds number region is required. In this paper, new experimental results for the friction factor and the velocity profile at high Reynolds number up to 10 are presented. The Reynolds number dependency of the constants in the formulae of the friction factor and the velocity profile are discussed using the experimental result. Furthermore, to show the reliability of the experimental results, the higher level consistency of the measurement data between the friction factor and velocity profile is presented. In this experiments, the Hi-Reff (High Reynolds number actual flow facility) (Furuichi et al, 2009) was used. The working fluids in this facility is water. The feature of this facility is high Reynolds number and high accurate flowrate measurement. The maximum Reynolds number based on diameter of pipe is ReD=2×10 (based on friction velocity, Reτ=3×10). The flow rate is measured by the static gravimetric method or the reference flowmeters calibrated by the weighing tank. The uncertainty of the flow rate ranges from 0.060% to 0.10% with the coverage factor of k=2. The velocity profile was measured by using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). The examined Reynolds number ranges ReD=3.9×10 1.1×10 (Reτ=1.0×10 – 2.1×10). The friction factor is obtained by the measurement of the pressure drop between two pressure taps installed in smooth pipes with D=100 mm and 387 mm. The examined Reynolds number for the friction factor measurement ranges ReD=7.1×10 1.8×10 (Reτ=2.3×10 – 2.7×10). The detail of experimental results are shown in the reference (Furuichi et al., 2015). Using the experimental results, the Reynolds number dependence of the Kármán and the additive constants (κ and B respectively) is investigated as shown in the figure. The behaviors of both constants are found to change at approximately ReD=3×10 5×10. Both constants vary in the bulk Reynolds number region ReD<5 × 10 (Reτ<10) and remain invariant at values of κ=0.383 and B=4.335 with changing Reynolds number for ReD>5×10 (Reτ>10). The consistency between the velocity profile and the friction factor is investigated by integrating the velocity profile data. The velocity profile data are fitted by the log law, and the equation for the friction factor is derived by integrating the fitted equation of the velocity profile. This friction factor equation is found to suitably represent the friction factor data, with the equation deviating from the friction by less than 1%. This analysis indicates that the friction factor for 10<ReD<10 cannot be expressed by a unique equation for the velocity profile based on the log law because the Kármán and the additive constants have Reynolds number dependence at low Reynolds numbers (ReD<3×10). At high Reynolds numbers (ReD>5×10), the friction factor can be expressed by a unique equation, which yields κ=0.383 and B=4.335. This friction factor behavior is consistent with the behavior of the constants in the mean velocity profile. REFERENCES Kim, J., “Progress in pipe and channel flow turbulence, 1961-2011”, Journal of Turbulence, 13, 45, 1-19, (2012) Furuichi, N., Sato, H., Terao, Y. and Takamoto, M., “A New Calibration Facility of Flowrate for High Reynolds Number”, Flow Meas. Inst. 20-1, 38-47 (2009) Furuichi, N., Terao, Y., Wada Y. and Tsuji, Y., “Friction factor and mean velocity profile for pipe flow at high Reynolds numbers”, Physics of Fluids, 27, 095108 (2015), 104 105 106 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41\",\"PeriodicalId\":266791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding of Tenth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding of Tenth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp10.1100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Tenth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp10.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管道流是典型的有壁流动之一,在工程领域有着广泛的应用。由于了解管道流动的物理特性对于实现流体的有效输送是非常重要的,自20世纪初以来,人们对充分发展的湍流管道流动进行了许多研究。然而,正如Kim(2012)所总结的那样,由于雷诺数效应,即使是平均速度剖面的函数形式也仍然不完整。速度剖面公式不一致的原因之一是以往实验中用于速度剖面尺度化的壁面剪应力也不一致。获得壁面剪切应力(或等效的摩擦系数)不仅对管道流动,而且对一般的壁面流动都很重要。不一致的第二个原因是速度剖面公式的雷诺数依赖性。与其他壁面边界流动、边界层流动和通道流动一样,速度剖面公式中的常数受到雷诺数的影响。为了讨论速度分布的普遍性,需要在高雷诺数区域进行管道流动实验。本文给出了高雷诺数下摩擦系数和速度分布的新实验结果。利用实验结果讨论了摩擦系数公式中各常数与速度分布的雷诺数关系。此外,为了证明实验结果的可靠性,摩擦力系数与速度剖面的测量数据具有较高的一致性。本实验使用Hi-Reff(高雷诺数实际流动装置)(Furuichi et al, 2009)。这个设备的工作流体是水。该装置的特点是高雷诺数和高精度的流量测量。基于管径的最大雷诺数ReD=2×10(基于摩擦速度,Reτ=3×10)。流量的测量采用静态重量法或称重罐校准的参考流量计。流量的不确定度范围为0.060% ~ 0.10%,覆盖系数k=2。采用激光多普勒测速仪(LDV)测量速度剖面。所测雷诺数范围ReD=3.9×10 1.1×10 (Reτ=1.0×10 - 2.1×10)。摩擦系数通过测量安装在D=100 mm和387 mm光滑管道中的两个压力水龙头之间的压降得到。所测摩擦系数的雷诺数范围ReD=7.1×10 1.8×10 (Reτ=2.3×10 - 2.7×10)。实验结果详见参考文献(Furuichi et al., 2015)。利用实验结果,研究了Kármán和加性常数(κ和B)对雷诺数的依赖关系,如图所示。发现两个常数的行为在大约ReD=3×10 5×10时发生变化。这两个常数在体积雷诺数区域ReD5×10变化(Reτ>10)。通过对速度剖面数据的积分,研究了速度剖面与摩擦系数的一致性。采用对数法拟合速度剖面数据,对拟合的速度剖面方程进行积分,得到摩擦系数方程。结果表明,该摩擦因数方程能较好地表示摩擦因数数据,与实际摩擦因数的偏差小于1%。分析表明,对于105×10),摩擦系数可以用唯一方程表示,得到κ=0.383, B=4.335。这种摩擦系数的行为与平均速度剖面中常数的行为是一致的。参考文献Kim, J.,“管道和通道流动湍流的进展,1961-2011”,湍流学报,13,45,1-19,(2012)Furuichi, N., Sato, H., Terao, Y.和Takamoto, M.,“一种新的高雷诺数流量校准设备”,flow mees。李建军,张建军,张建军,“高雷诺数下管道流动的摩擦系数和平均速度分布”,流体物理学报,27 (2015),104 105 106 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 (2009)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relation between Velocity Profile and Friction Factor at High Reynolds Number in Fully Developed Pipe Flow
Pipe flow, which is one of the canonical wall-bounded flows, finds wide application in engineering fields. Because knowledge of the physics of pipe flow is very important to achieve effective fluid transport, many studies on fully developed turbulent pipe flow have been performed since the early 1900s. However, even the functional form for the mean velocity profile remains incomplete because of the Reynolds number effect, as summarized by Kim (2012). One of the reason for the inconsistency of the velocity profile formulae is that the wall shear stress used for the scaling of the velocity profile is also inconsistent among previous experiments. Obtaining the wall shear stress (or equivalently the friction factor) is important for not only pipe flows but also for wall-bounded flows in general. The second reason of the inconsistency is the Reynolds number dependency of the velocity profile formula. As investigated in other type of the wall bounded flows, boundary layer and channel flow, the constants in the velocity profile formula are influenced by Reynolds number. To discuss the universality of the velocity profile, the pipe flow experiments at higher Reynolds number region is required. In this paper, new experimental results for the friction factor and the velocity profile at high Reynolds number up to 10 are presented. The Reynolds number dependency of the constants in the formulae of the friction factor and the velocity profile are discussed using the experimental result. Furthermore, to show the reliability of the experimental results, the higher level consistency of the measurement data between the friction factor and velocity profile is presented. In this experiments, the Hi-Reff (High Reynolds number actual flow facility) (Furuichi et al, 2009) was used. The working fluids in this facility is water. The feature of this facility is high Reynolds number and high accurate flowrate measurement. The maximum Reynolds number based on diameter of pipe is ReD=2×10 (based on friction velocity, Reτ=3×10). The flow rate is measured by the static gravimetric method or the reference flowmeters calibrated by the weighing tank. The uncertainty of the flow rate ranges from 0.060% to 0.10% with the coverage factor of k=2. The velocity profile was measured by using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). The examined Reynolds number ranges ReD=3.9×10 1.1×10 (Reτ=1.0×10 – 2.1×10). The friction factor is obtained by the measurement of the pressure drop between two pressure taps installed in smooth pipes with D=100 mm and 387 mm. The examined Reynolds number for the friction factor measurement ranges ReD=7.1×10 1.8×10 (Reτ=2.3×10 – 2.7×10). The detail of experimental results are shown in the reference (Furuichi et al., 2015). Using the experimental results, the Reynolds number dependence of the Kármán and the additive constants (κ and B respectively) is investigated as shown in the figure. The behaviors of both constants are found to change at approximately ReD=3×10 5×10. Both constants vary in the bulk Reynolds number region ReD<5 × 10 (Reτ<10) and remain invariant at values of κ=0.383 and B=4.335 with changing Reynolds number for ReD>5×10 (Reτ>10). The consistency between the velocity profile and the friction factor is investigated by integrating the velocity profile data. The velocity profile data are fitted by the log law, and the equation for the friction factor is derived by integrating the fitted equation of the velocity profile. This friction factor equation is found to suitably represent the friction factor data, with the equation deviating from the friction by less than 1%. This analysis indicates that the friction factor for 105×10), the friction factor can be expressed by a unique equation, which yields κ=0.383 and B=4.335. This friction factor behavior is consistent with the behavior of the constants in the mean velocity profile. REFERENCES Kim, J., “Progress in pipe and channel flow turbulence, 1961-2011”, Journal of Turbulence, 13, 45, 1-19, (2012) Furuichi, N., Sato, H., Terao, Y. and Takamoto, M., “A New Calibration Facility of Flowrate for High Reynolds Number”, Flow Meas. Inst. 20-1, 38-47 (2009) Furuichi, N., Terao, Y., Wada Y. and Tsuji, Y., “Friction factor and mean velocity profile for pipe flow at high Reynolds numbers”, Physics of Fluids, 27, 095108 (2015), 104 105 106 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信