转型中的企业社会责任:从自愿到强制性——印度案例

Liad Ortar
{"title":"转型中的企业社会责任:从自愿到强制性——印度案例","authors":"Liad Ortar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3783846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presented here summarizes the first stage of a large bilateral (Israeli and Indian) academic effort. This scholarly endeavor involves an attempt to explore the impact of the Indian Mandatory CSR (MCSR) law from both practical and theoretical perspectives. We look at this unique legislation as a “pilot” scheme that challenges traditional terminologies such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), with its basic precondition of voluntarism (“beyond compliance”), Corporate Philanthropy, and the role of taxation between the two. Our focus in this study is on the concept of CSR and on a thematic discussion of the literature review’s findings. The two other themes are left for future investigation.<br><br>The systematic review includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of 47 academic papers regarding MCSR in India. The results provide significant background information for intended further research on the subject matter. For example, 72% of the studies were conducted by Indian scholars, suggesting that the MCSR is not an attractive research topic, possibly because Western researchers do not view it as relevant. Another finding is that most of the studies reviewed (63%) were qualitative, perhaps indicating that they are focused more on managerial interviews, other reviews, and legal articles, and less on financial performance or other statistical measures. Qualitatively, the leading themes were that MCSR is debated as a form of taxation, the 2% spending cap that became a ceiling, the limits of the “comply or explain” approach, corporate fraud, MCSR’s relevance to SMEs, the director’s duties to the stakeholders and last, geographical inequality.","PeriodicalId":153840,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSR in Transition: from Voluntary to Mandatory – the Indian Case\",\"authors\":\"Liad Ortar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3783846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research presented here summarizes the first stage of a large bilateral (Israeli and Indian) academic effort. This scholarly endeavor involves an attempt to explore the impact of the Indian Mandatory CSR (MCSR) law from both practical and theoretical perspectives. We look at this unique legislation as a “pilot” scheme that challenges traditional terminologies such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), with its basic precondition of voluntarism (“beyond compliance”), Corporate Philanthropy, and the role of taxation between the two. Our focus in this study is on the concept of CSR and on a thematic discussion of the literature review’s findings. The two other themes are left for future investigation.<br><br>The systematic review includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of 47 academic papers regarding MCSR in India. The results provide significant background information for intended further research on the subject matter. For example, 72% of the studies were conducted by Indian scholars, suggesting that the MCSR is not an attractive research topic, possibly because Western researchers do not view it as relevant. Another finding is that most of the studies reviewed (63%) were qualitative, perhaps indicating that they are focused more on managerial interviews, other reviews, and legal articles, and less on financial performance or other statistical measures. Qualitatively, the leading themes were that MCSR is debated as a form of taxation, the 2% spending cap that became a ceiling, the limits of the “comply or explain” approach, corporate fraud, MCSR’s relevance to SMEs, the director’s duties to the stakeholders and last, geographical inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3783846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets: Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3783846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这里提出的研究总结了一个大型双边(以色列和印度)学术努力的第一阶段。这一学术尝试包括从实践和理论两个角度探讨印度强制性企业社会责任法的影响。我们将这项独特的立法视为一项“试点”计划,挑战传统术语,如企业社会责任(CSR),其基本前提是自愿(“超越合规”),企业慈善事业,以及税收在两者之间的作用。我们在这项研究中的重点是企业社会责任的概念,并对文献综述的发现进行专题讨论。另外两个主题将留给未来的研究。系统综述包括对47篇关于印度MCSR的学术论文进行定量和定性分析。研究结果为本课题的进一步研究提供了重要的背景资料。例如,72%的研究是由印度学者进行的,这表明MCSR不是一个有吸引力的研究主题,可能是因为西方研究人员认为它不相关。另一个发现是,大多数被审查的研究(63%)都是定性的,这可能表明它们更关注管理访谈、其他评论和法律文章,而较少关注财务业绩或其他统计指标。从质量上讲,主要主题是MCSR作为一种税收形式进行辩论,2%的支出上限成为上限,“遵守或解释”方法的限制,公司欺诈,MCSR与中小企业的相关性,董事对利益相关者的责任以及最后,地域不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CSR in Transition: from Voluntary to Mandatory – the Indian Case
The research presented here summarizes the first stage of a large bilateral (Israeli and Indian) academic effort. This scholarly endeavor involves an attempt to explore the impact of the Indian Mandatory CSR (MCSR) law from both practical and theoretical perspectives. We look at this unique legislation as a “pilot” scheme that challenges traditional terminologies such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), with its basic precondition of voluntarism (“beyond compliance”), Corporate Philanthropy, and the role of taxation between the two. Our focus in this study is on the concept of CSR and on a thematic discussion of the literature review’s findings. The two other themes are left for future investigation.

The systematic review includes quantitative and qualitative analysis of 47 academic papers regarding MCSR in India. The results provide significant background information for intended further research on the subject matter. For example, 72% of the studies were conducted by Indian scholars, suggesting that the MCSR is not an attractive research topic, possibly because Western researchers do not view it as relevant. Another finding is that most of the studies reviewed (63%) were qualitative, perhaps indicating that they are focused more on managerial interviews, other reviews, and legal articles, and less on financial performance or other statistical measures. Qualitatively, the leading themes were that MCSR is debated as a form of taxation, the 2% spending cap that became a ceiling, the limits of the “comply or explain” approach, corporate fraud, MCSR’s relevance to SMEs, the director’s duties to the stakeholders and last, geographical inequality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信