基于规范的生活垃圾反馈:瑞典两个城市的大规模实地试验

Centre for Collective Action Submitter, Claes Ek, Magnus Söderberg
{"title":"基于规范的生活垃圾反馈:瑞典两个城市的大规模实地试验","authors":"Centre for Collective Action Submitter, Claes Ek, Magnus Söderberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3876029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conduct separate randomized controlled trials of norm-based feedback nudges on house-hold waste in two municipalities in western Sweden. Our main treatment presents recipients with accurate, household-specific feedback highly similar to the standard Home Energy Report design, but with residual (unsorted) waste as the object of comparison. We also test a novel ‘dynamic’ norm design informed by psychological research. Post-experimental reductions are on the order of 7-12% in both municipalities, substantially larger than inmost previous studies. We estimate that the reduction corresponds to a 30-60% increase in unit-based waste fees. Effect differences between our main treatment and the dynamic-norm treatment are not significant. We find that feedback nudges are highly cost-effective compared to alternative means for reducing household residual waste. However, net social benefits depend on whether existing waste fees internalize the marginal social cost of residual waste. Our results have implications for the usefulness of feedback interventions as well as for unit-based pricing of waste, on which our feedback materials rely.","PeriodicalId":388441,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norm-Based Feedback on Household Waste: Large-Scale Field Experiments in Two Swedish Municipalities\",\"authors\":\"Centre for Collective Action Submitter, Claes Ek, Magnus Söderberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3876029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conduct separate randomized controlled trials of norm-based feedback nudges on house-hold waste in two municipalities in western Sweden. Our main treatment presents recipients with accurate, household-specific feedback highly similar to the standard Home Energy Report design, but with residual (unsorted) waste as the object of comparison. We also test a novel ‘dynamic’ norm design informed by psychological research. Post-experimental reductions are on the order of 7-12% in both municipalities, substantially larger than inmost previous studies. We estimate that the reduction corresponds to a 30-60% increase in unit-based waste fees. Effect differences between our main treatment and the dynamic-norm treatment are not significant. We find that feedback nudges are highly cost-effective compared to alternative means for reducing household residual waste. However, net social benefits depend on whether existing waste fees internalize the marginal social cost of residual waste. Our results have implications for the usefulness of feedback interventions as well as for unit-based pricing of waste, on which our feedback materials rely.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们在瑞典西部的两个城市对家庭垃圾进行了基于规范的反馈推动的随机对照试验。我们的主要处理方式为接收人提供准确的、家庭特定的反馈,与标准的家庭能源报告设计高度相似,但以剩余(未分类)废物作为比较对象。我们还测试了一种基于心理学研究的新型“动态”规范设计。在这两个城市,实验后的减少幅度约为7-12%,大大大于之前的大多数研究。我们估计,这一减少相当于单位废物费增加了30-60%。我们的主要治疗方法与动态规范治疗方法的效果差异不显著。我们发现,与减少家庭剩余废物的其他方法相比,反馈推动具有很高的成本效益。然而,净社会效益取决于现有的废物收费是否内部化了剩余废物的边际社会成本。我们的研究结果对反馈干预的有用性以及我们的反馈材料所依赖的基于单位的废物定价具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Norm-Based Feedback on Household Waste: Large-Scale Field Experiments in Two Swedish Municipalities
We conduct separate randomized controlled trials of norm-based feedback nudges on house-hold waste in two municipalities in western Sweden. Our main treatment presents recipients with accurate, household-specific feedback highly similar to the standard Home Energy Report design, but with residual (unsorted) waste as the object of comparison. We also test a novel ‘dynamic’ norm design informed by psychological research. Post-experimental reductions are on the order of 7-12% in both municipalities, substantially larger than inmost previous studies. We estimate that the reduction corresponds to a 30-60% increase in unit-based waste fees. Effect differences between our main treatment and the dynamic-norm treatment are not significant. We find that feedback nudges are highly cost-effective compared to alternative means for reducing household residual waste. However, net social benefits depend on whether existing waste fees internalize the marginal social cost of residual waste. Our results have implications for the usefulness of feedback interventions as well as for unit-based pricing of waste, on which our feedback materials rely.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信