Joseph Kleugten, s.j.,前现代哲学辩护

J. Coyle
{"title":"Joseph Kleugten, s.j.,前现代哲学辩护","authors":"J. Coyle","doi":"10.1177/1063851220952328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imagine my surprise when, asked his opinion on Joseph Kleugten, S.J. (1811– 1883), a self-professed Neothomist of my acquaintance replied, Simon Peterlike, that he knew not the man. Nonplussed, I first assumed his ignorance feigned. One could scarcely blame him—Kleutgen’s story gives considerable scandal. As the conversation developed, however, my Thomist friend’s ignorance proved bona fide. He’d honestly never heard tell of Kleutgen, much less read him. Which would be entirely understandable were he not, again, a selfprofessed Neothomist. So how could it be, I puzzled, that so prolific an architect of Neoscholasticism—so beloved of Pius IX, so influential behind Vatican I’s Dei Filius and Leo XIII’s Aeterni Patris, so instrumental to the Congregation of the Index—could be consigned to oblivion, forgotten by his own intellectual heirs? Within this gloom of forgetting shines William H. Marshner’s translation of the second edition of the first volume—and not, as the translator claims, the whole—of Kleutgen’s Philosophie der Vorzeit verteidigt (1860–1863; 1878). Marshner’s translation reads bright, clean, precise. Readers who have braved Kleutgen’s nineteenth-century, fraktur-crabbed German will admire the skill requisite to render it into readable, even beautiful, English. Let’s hope against hope that Marshner intends to render its second volume too. And, so long as we’re hoping, Kleutgen’s three-volume Theologie der Vorzeit (1853–1860) also. Kleutgen’s Pre-Modern Philosophy elaborates what his Pre-Modern Theology only hinted at: a philosophical defense of Thomistic realism as salve for post-Enlightenment subjectivism. Thus Kleutgen’s goal for Pre-Modern Philosophy is “to answer the attacks which even Catholic scholars make against the philosophy of pre-modernity” (p. 15). The “Catholic scholars” he 952328 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952328Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theologybook review book-review2020","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joseph Kleugten, S.J., Pre-Modern Philosophy Defended\",\"authors\":\"J. Coyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1063851220952328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Imagine my surprise when, asked his opinion on Joseph Kleugten, S.J. (1811– 1883), a self-professed Neothomist of my acquaintance replied, Simon Peterlike, that he knew not the man. Nonplussed, I first assumed his ignorance feigned. One could scarcely blame him—Kleutgen’s story gives considerable scandal. As the conversation developed, however, my Thomist friend’s ignorance proved bona fide. He’d honestly never heard tell of Kleutgen, much less read him. Which would be entirely understandable were he not, again, a selfprofessed Neothomist. So how could it be, I puzzled, that so prolific an architect of Neoscholasticism—so beloved of Pius IX, so influential behind Vatican I’s Dei Filius and Leo XIII’s Aeterni Patris, so instrumental to the Congregation of the Index—could be consigned to oblivion, forgotten by his own intellectual heirs? Within this gloom of forgetting shines William H. Marshner’s translation of the second edition of the first volume—and not, as the translator claims, the whole—of Kleutgen’s Philosophie der Vorzeit verteidigt (1860–1863; 1878). Marshner’s translation reads bright, clean, precise. Readers who have braved Kleutgen’s nineteenth-century, fraktur-crabbed German will admire the skill requisite to render it into readable, even beautiful, English. Let’s hope against hope that Marshner intends to render its second volume too. And, so long as we’re hoping, Kleutgen’s three-volume Theologie der Vorzeit (1853–1860) also. Kleutgen’s Pre-Modern Philosophy elaborates what his Pre-Modern Theology only hinted at: a philosophical defense of Thomistic realism as salve for post-Enlightenment subjectivism. Thus Kleutgen’s goal for Pre-Modern Philosophy is “to answer the attacks which even Catholic scholars make against the philosophy of pre-modernity” (p. 15). The “Catholic scholars” he 952328 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952328Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theologybook review book-review2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":223812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220952328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1063851220952328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当被问及对约瑟夫·克劳格滕(Joseph Kleugten, S.J., 1811 - 1883)的看法时,我很惊讶,我认识的一个自称新thomist的人回答说,他不认识这个人。我不知所措,起初以为他的无知是假装的。人们几乎不能责怪他——克劳特根的故事引起了相当大的丑闻。然而,随着谈话的深入,我的托马斯主义朋友的无知被证明是真诚的。老实说,他从未听说过克鲁特根,更不用说读他的书了。这是完全可以理解的,如果他不是一个自称的新thomist的话。那么,我感到困惑的是,如此多产的一位新经院哲学的建筑师——如此受庇护九世的爱戴,如此影响梵蒂冈一世的《上帝保佑》和利奥十三世的《永恒的上帝》,如此促进了圣公会——怎么会被遗忘,被他自己的知识分子继承人遗忘呢?在这种遗忘的阴霾中,威廉·h·马什纳(William H. Marshner)翻译了第一卷的第二版,但正如译者所声称的那样,并不是克莱特根(Kleutgen)的《思想哲学》(Philosophie der Vorzeit verteidigt, 1860-1863;1878)。马什纳的翻译读起来明亮、干净、准确。读过克劳特根19世纪德文的读者会欣赏他将其翻译成可读、甚至优美的英语所必需的技巧。让我们抱着一线希望,希望马什纳也打算出版他的第二卷。而且,只要我们希望,还有克劳特根的三卷本《神学》(Theologie der Vorzeit, 1853-1860)克劳特根的《前现代哲学》阐述了他的《前现代神学》所暗示的:对托马斯主义实在论的哲学辩护,作为后启蒙时代主观主义的药膏。因此,Kleutgen的《前现代哲学》的目标是“回应甚至天主教学者对前现代性哲学的攻击”(第15页)。《天主教学者》[952328 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952328Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical theology]书评,书评,2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joseph Kleugten, S.J., Pre-Modern Philosophy Defended
Imagine my surprise when, asked his opinion on Joseph Kleugten, S.J. (1811– 1883), a self-professed Neothomist of my acquaintance replied, Simon Peterlike, that he knew not the man. Nonplussed, I first assumed his ignorance feigned. One could scarcely blame him—Kleutgen’s story gives considerable scandal. As the conversation developed, however, my Thomist friend’s ignorance proved bona fide. He’d honestly never heard tell of Kleutgen, much less read him. Which would be entirely understandable were he not, again, a selfprofessed Neothomist. So how could it be, I puzzled, that so prolific an architect of Neoscholasticism—so beloved of Pius IX, so influential behind Vatican I’s Dei Filius and Leo XIII’s Aeterni Patris, so instrumental to the Congregation of the Index—could be consigned to oblivion, forgotten by his own intellectual heirs? Within this gloom of forgetting shines William H. Marshner’s translation of the second edition of the first volume—and not, as the translator claims, the whole—of Kleutgen’s Philosophie der Vorzeit verteidigt (1860–1863; 1878). Marshner’s translation reads bright, clean, precise. Readers who have braved Kleutgen’s nineteenth-century, fraktur-crabbed German will admire the skill requisite to render it into readable, even beautiful, English. Let’s hope against hope that Marshner intends to render its second volume too. And, so long as we’re hoping, Kleutgen’s three-volume Theologie der Vorzeit (1853–1860) also. Kleutgen’s Pre-Modern Philosophy elaborates what his Pre-Modern Theology only hinted at: a philosophical defense of Thomistic realism as salve for post-Enlightenment subjectivism. Thus Kleutgen’s goal for Pre-Modern Philosophy is “to answer the attacks which even Catholic scholars make against the philosophy of pre-modernity” (p. 15). The “Catholic scholars” he 952328 PRE0010.1177/1063851220952328Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theologybook review book-review2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信