运行中MHD角速率传感器噪声本底估计方法的评价

Fan Liu, Xing-Fei Li, Ganming Xia
{"title":"运行中MHD角速率传感器噪声本底估计方法的评价","authors":"Fan Liu, Xing-Fei Li, Ganming Xia","doi":"10.1109/ICMIE55541.2022.10048617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Noise floor plays a key role in evaluating the quality of MHD Angular Rate Sensors (MHD-ARSs). It determines the smallest angular rate signals that can be detected. Consequently, how to measure the noise floor accurately has become a critical issue. To the best of our knowledge, little research has been conducted into the noise floor measurement of MHD-ARSs. Moreover, noise floor estimators which have been used are not clearly defined and assessed. In this research, we aim at the evaluation of two methods for estimating noise floor of MHDARSs in operation, namely two-channel method and three-channel method. We present mathematical models and derive bias errors of both two methods. We set up a noise floor measurement system for two identical MHD-ARSs and test the two methods under the condition in which the two sensors operate in a high output SNR regime. We have obtained significant results demonstrating that: 1) Normalized bias error of two-channel method is approximately 80% to 100% in the case of SNR value greater than 10 dB. 2) Three-channel method exhibits no bias errors in theory, but it suffers from random errors originated from normalized random errors of PSD estimates.","PeriodicalId":186894,"journal":{"name":"2022 6th International Conference on Measurement Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Noise Floor of MHD Angular Rate Sensors in Operation\",\"authors\":\"Fan Liu, Xing-Fei Li, Ganming Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMIE55541.2022.10048617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Noise floor plays a key role in evaluating the quality of MHD Angular Rate Sensors (MHD-ARSs). It determines the smallest angular rate signals that can be detected. Consequently, how to measure the noise floor accurately has become a critical issue. To the best of our knowledge, little research has been conducted into the noise floor measurement of MHD-ARSs. Moreover, noise floor estimators which have been used are not clearly defined and assessed. In this research, we aim at the evaluation of two methods for estimating noise floor of MHDARSs in operation, namely two-channel method and three-channel method. We present mathematical models and derive bias errors of both two methods. We set up a noise floor measurement system for two identical MHD-ARSs and test the two methods under the condition in which the two sensors operate in a high output SNR regime. We have obtained significant results demonstrating that: 1) Normalized bias error of two-channel method is approximately 80% to 100% in the case of SNR value greater than 10 dB. 2) Three-channel method exhibits no bias errors in theory, but it suffers from random errors originated from normalized random errors of PSD estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Measurement Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 6th International Conference on Measurement Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIE55541.2022.10048617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 6th International Conference on Measurement Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIE55541.2022.10048617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

噪声本底是评价MHD角速率传感器(MHD- ars)质量的关键。它确定可以检测到的最小角速率信号。因此,如何准确地测量噪声本底就成为一个关键问题。据我们所知,对mhd - ars的本底噪声测量进行的研究很少。此外,所使用的噪音底估计器并没有明确界定和评估。在本研究中,我们旨在评价两种估计mhdars在运行中的噪声本底的方法,即双通道法和三通道法。我们建立了数学模型并推导了两种方法的偏差误差。我们为两个相同的mhd - ars建立了噪声本底测量系统,并在两个传感器在高输出信噪比下工作的条件下测试了两种方法。结果表明:1)在信噪比大于10 dB的情况下,双通道方法的归一化偏置误差约为80% ~ 100%。2)三通道方法理论上没有偏置误差,但由于PSD估计的归一化随机误差,存在随机误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Noise Floor of MHD Angular Rate Sensors in Operation
Noise floor plays a key role in evaluating the quality of MHD Angular Rate Sensors (MHD-ARSs). It determines the smallest angular rate signals that can be detected. Consequently, how to measure the noise floor accurately has become a critical issue. To the best of our knowledge, little research has been conducted into the noise floor measurement of MHD-ARSs. Moreover, noise floor estimators which have been used are not clearly defined and assessed. In this research, we aim at the evaluation of two methods for estimating noise floor of MHDARSs in operation, namely two-channel method and three-channel method. We present mathematical models and derive bias errors of both two methods. We set up a noise floor measurement system for two identical MHD-ARSs and test the two methods under the condition in which the two sensors operate in a high output SNR regime. We have obtained significant results demonstrating that: 1) Normalized bias error of two-channel method is approximately 80% to 100% in the case of SNR value greater than 10 dB. 2) Three-channel method exhibits no bias errors in theory, but it suffers from random errors originated from normalized random errors of PSD estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信