{"title":"部分库存池化的可行性","authors":"Y. Gerchak","doi":"10.1504/IJIR.2017.10006034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When demands are uncertain, complete inventory pooling is known to be a better strategy than no pooling if the trans-shipment cost is low enough; otherwise, pooling is undesirable. But are there situations where pooling some inventories, but not the rest, in a central warehouse, are the best strategy? We show that such is indeed the case for certain demand distributions and cost parameter values. We show it for a symmetric discrete demand scenario, as well as for a symmetric continuous demand scenario.","PeriodicalId":113309,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inventory Research","volume":"27 17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the viability of partial inventory pooling\",\"authors\":\"Y. Gerchak\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJIR.2017.10006034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When demands are uncertain, complete inventory pooling is known to be a better strategy than no pooling if the trans-shipment cost is low enough; otherwise, pooling is undesirable. But are there situations where pooling some inventories, but not the rest, in a central warehouse, are the best strategy? We show that such is indeed the case for certain demand distributions and cost parameter values. We show it for a symmetric discrete demand scenario, as well as for a symmetric continuous demand scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Inventory Research\",\"volume\":\"27 17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Inventory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIR.2017.10006034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inventory Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIR.2017.10006034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
When demands are uncertain, complete inventory pooling is known to be a better strategy than no pooling if the trans-shipment cost is low enough; otherwise, pooling is undesirable. But are there situations where pooling some inventories, but not the rest, in a central warehouse, are the best strategy? We show that such is indeed the case for certain demand distributions and cost parameter values. We show it for a symmetric discrete demand scenario, as well as for a symmetric continuous demand scenario.