回到未来:为21世纪引入建设性女权主义:家庭和医疗休假法案的新范式

Arianne Renan Barzilay
{"title":"回到未来:为21世纪引入建设性女权主义:家庭和医疗休假法案的新范式","authors":"Arianne Renan Barzilay","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3009942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At least ninety percent (90%) of American parents, mothers and fathers, say they are experiencing an acute shortage of time spent with family and an intense work-family conflict. This article provides a history and a theory that should inform our conceptualization of work-family regulation. It points to the neglected history of working-class social feminism. It shows how working-class social feminists at the beginning of the twentieth century advocated for “constructive feminism” — government support, by way of labor regulation, of what this article terms “multidimensionalism” — a life enriched by meaningful dimensions of work, family, civic participation, and culture. The Article extends this history to a theory of work-family balance for today’s world, which centers on multidimensionalism by way of regulation. It claims this theory should provide a framework for designing and evaluating public policy, and should inform measures to ameliorate the work-family conflict, such as paid leave, “daddy quotas,” and quality childcare. The Article concludes that to adhere to constructive feminism’s multidimensional paradigm, Congress should further enhance the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).","PeriodicalId":144581,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Law and Policy Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to the Future: Introducing Constructive Feminism for the Twenty-First Century: A New Paradigm for the Family and Medical Leave Act\",\"authors\":\"Arianne Renan Barzilay\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3009942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At least ninety percent (90%) of American parents, mothers and fathers, say they are experiencing an acute shortage of time spent with family and an intense work-family conflict. This article provides a history and a theory that should inform our conceptualization of work-family regulation. It points to the neglected history of working-class social feminism. It shows how working-class social feminists at the beginning of the twentieth century advocated for “constructive feminism” — government support, by way of labor regulation, of what this article terms “multidimensionalism” — a life enriched by meaningful dimensions of work, family, civic participation, and culture. The Article extends this history to a theory of work-family balance for today’s world, which centers on multidimensionalism by way of regulation. It claims this theory should provide a framework for designing and evaluating public policy, and should inform measures to ameliorate the work-family conflict, such as paid leave, “daddy quotas,” and quality childcare. The Article concludes that to adhere to constructive feminism’s multidimensional paradigm, Congress should further enhance the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":144581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Law and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Law and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Law and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

至少90%的美国父母(包括父母)表示,他们与家人在一起的时间严重不足,工作与家庭的冲突也很严重。这篇文章提供了一个历史和理论,应该告知我们的概念工作-家庭调节。它指出了被忽视的工人阶级社会女权主义的历史。它展示了20世纪初工人阶级社会女权主义者是如何倡导“建设性女权主义”的——政府通过劳动法规的方式支持本文所说的“多维主义”——一种由工作、家庭、公民参与和文化等有意义的维度丰富的生活。本文将这段历史扩展到当今世界的工作-家庭平衡理论,该理论以监管的多维主义为中心。它声称,这一理论应该为设计和评估公共政策提供一个框架,并应该为改善工作与家庭冲突的措施提供信息,比如带薪休假、“爸爸配额”和高质量的儿童保育。本文的结论是,为了坚持建设性女权主义的多维范式,国会应进一步完善《家庭与医疗休假法》(FMLA)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Back to the Future: Introducing Constructive Feminism for the Twenty-First Century: A New Paradigm for the Family and Medical Leave Act
At least ninety percent (90%) of American parents, mothers and fathers, say they are experiencing an acute shortage of time spent with family and an intense work-family conflict. This article provides a history and a theory that should inform our conceptualization of work-family regulation. It points to the neglected history of working-class social feminism. It shows how working-class social feminists at the beginning of the twentieth century advocated for “constructive feminism” — government support, by way of labor regulation, of what this article terms “multidimensionalism” — a life enriched by meaningful dimensions of work, family, civic participation, and culture. The Article extends this history to a theory of work-family balance for today’s world, which centers on multidimensionalism by way of regulation. It claims this theory should provide a framework for designing and evaluating public policy, and should inform measures to ameliorate the work-family conflict, such as paid leave, “daddy quotas,” and quality childcare. The Article concludes that to adhere to constructive feminism’s multidimensional paradigm, Congress should further enhance the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信