{"title":"私人基础设施的政治化:香港行人天桥网络","authors":"Jennifer Lee Michaliszyn","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.105.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 “Umbrella Protest’ and 2011-12 Occupy Central demonstrations in Hong Kong were sited along and under segments of the city’s well-known pedestrian bridge infrastructure. The walkways are often cited by critics as examples of a public realm compromised by private management and surveillance. But these recent events compel a reexamination of the bridge network, and whether these privatized connectors, through their appropriation as spaces of informal and unsanctioned activity, have evolved into a supporting armature for dissent and a kind of ‘infrastructure of inclusion’.","PeriodicalId":122603,"journal":{"name":"Brooklyn Says, \"Move to Detroit\"","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politicization of a Private Infrastructure: Hong Kong’s Pedestrian Bridge Network\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Lee Michaliszyn\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.105.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2014 “Umbrella Protest’ and 2011-12 Occupy Central demonstrations in Hong Kong were sited along and under segments of the city’s well-known pedestrian bridge infrastructure. The walkways are often cited by critics as examples of a public realm compromised by private management and surveillance. But these recent events compel a reexamination of the bridge network, and whether these privatized connectors, through their appropriation as spaces of informal and unsanctioned activity, have evolved into a supporting armature for dissent and a kind of ‘infrastructure of inclusion’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brooklyn Says, \\\"Move to Detroit\\\"\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brooklyn Says, \\\"Move to Detroit\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.105.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brooklyn Says, \"Move to Detroit\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.105.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Politicization of a Private Infrastructure: Hong Kong’s Pedestrian Bridge Network
The 2014 “Umbrella Protest’ and 2011-12 Occupy Central demonstrations in Hong Kong were sited along and under segments of the city’s well-known pedestrian bridge infrastructure. The walkways are often cited by critics as examples of a public realm compromised by private management and surveillance. But these recent events compel a reexamination of the bridge network, and whether these privatized connectors, through their appropriation as spaces of informal and unsanctioned activity, have evolved into a supporting armature for dissent and a kind of ‘infrastructure of inclusion’.