ATO TR 2021/D4 -软件支付作为特许权使用费的征税-对裁决草案的评论

Ganesh Rajgopalan
{"title":"ATO TR 2021/D4 -软件支付作为特许权使用费的征税-对裁决草案的评论","authors":"Ganesh Rajgopalan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3897521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxation of software payments as royalties has been a vexed issue worldwide. The controversy has been settled to some extent by the Supreme Court in India but that ruling has also thrown up new controversies for future litigation. A fresh attempt by the Australian tax authorities to characterise software payments as royalties is interesting but not without problems. This piece deals with the understanding of the exclusive rights available to a copyright owner under the Australian Copyright Act, 1968 and the impact that should have while ascertaining the characterisation of software payments under the ITAA 1936. The conclusions drawn also should apply to interpret the meaning of the term royalties in double tax avoidance agreements. The write up is based on the submissions made by the author to the ATO in response to the Draft Ruling.","PeriodicalId":255520,"journal":{"name":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Rajgopalan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3897521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taxation of software payments as royalties has been a vexed issue worldwide. The controversy has been settled to some extent by the Supreme Court in India but that ruling has also thrown up new controversies for future litigation. A fresh attempt by the Australian tax authorities to characterise software payments as royalties is interesting but not without problems. This piece deals with the understanding of the exclusive rights available to a copyright owner under the Australian Copyright Act, 1968 and the impact that should have while ascertaining the characterisation of software payments under the ITAA 1936. The conclusions drawn also should apply to interpret the meaning of the term royalties in double tax avoidance agreements. The write up is based on the submissions made by the author to the ATO in response to the Draft Ruling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English & Commonwealth Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以版税形式对软件支付进行征税一直是全世界都在争论的问题。印度最高法院在一定程度上解决了这一争议,但这一裁决也为未来的诉讼带来了新的争议。澳大利亚税务当局将软件支付定性为版税的新尝试很有趣,但并非没有问题。这篇文章涉及对1968年澳大利亚版权法下版权所有者的专有权的理解,以及在确定ITAA 1936下软件支付的特征时应该产生的影响。所得结论也应适用于解释避免双重征税协定中特许权使用费一词的含义。这篇文章是基于作者在回应裁决草案时向ATO提交的意见书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE ATO TR 2021/D4 - Taxation of Software Payments as Royalties - Comments on the Draft Ruling
Taxation of software payments as royalties has been a vexed issue worldwide. The controversy has been settled to some extent by the Supreme Court in India but that ruling has also thrown up new controversies for future litigation. A fresh attempt by the Australian tax authorities to characterise software payments as royalties is interesting but not without problems. This piece deals with the understanding of the exclusive rights available to a copyright owner under the Australian Copyright Act, 1968 and the impact that should have while ascertaining the characterisation of software payments under the ITAA 1936. The conclusions drawn also should apply to interpret the meaning of the term royalties in double tax avoidance agreements. The write up is based on the submissions made by the author to the ATO in response to the Draft Ruling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信