Trisniawati Trisniawati, A. Rahayu, Nelly Rhosyida
{"title":"从一开始就培养对数学和科学的热爱","authors":"Trisniawati Trisniawati, A. Rahayu, Nelly Rhosyida","doi":"10.21009/jiv.1302.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide an overview of how the learning using origamasains can emerge fondness to mathematics and science subjects from the early age. The result of the study was expected to become the input for the upcoming learning and the reference for developing the learning at the basic level especially for the mathematics and science subjects. In order to get the accurate research result, the qualitative research method was employed. The data were analyzed using the data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data validity check procedures. The research was conducted in May - September 2018 at Jageran Yogyakarta early childhood school. The primary data being analyzed were the impression of the students to the given learning and the results of the interviews to the students. The finding showed that the students could learn better using the origamasains learning. In this first activity,80% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, while 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In this second activity 100% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity. Meanwhile in the third activity, 75% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In that third activity, the classroom’s good atmosphere was destructed by the crying from some students. \n \nReferences \nCossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211-244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426838 \nDepdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi mata pelajaran matematika. \nElytasari, S. (2017). Esensi metode Montessori dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 3(1), 59-73. http://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/article/view/2045 \nFajarwati, I. (2014). Konsep Montessori tentang pendidikan anak usia dini dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 37-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2014.111-03 \nHijriati, H. (2017). Tahapan perkembangan kognitif pada masa early childhood. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(2), 33-49. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/issue/view/289. \nKartono, K. (2007). Psikologi anak (Psikologi perkembangan). Bandung: Mandar Maju. \nLang, R. & Iverson, P. W. (2016). Origami 5: Fifth international meeting of origami science, mathematics, and education. Florida, Amerika: CRC Press. \nLillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893-1894. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362 \nMariana, I. M. A. (2009). Hakikat IPA dan pendidikan IPA. Jakarta: PPPPTK Untuk Program BERMUTU. \nMayer, E. R. (2003). Handbook of psychology, vol. 7 educational psychology 2003. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. \nMoleong, L. J. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. \nSanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Kencana. \nSugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r & d. Bandung: Alfabeta. \nSuherman, E. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: JICA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. \nSusanti, L. (2013). Pembelajaran berbasis origami untuk meningkatkan visualisasi spasial dan kemampuan geometri siswa SMP. MATHEdunesa, 2(2). http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2697 \nWestwood, P. (2004). Learning and learning difficulties: A handbook for teacher. Camberwell: Acer Press. \nYusuf, S. (2014). Psikologi perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.","PeriodicalId":234954,"journal":{"name":"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN ORIGAMASAINS UNTUK MENUMBUHKAN KECINTAAN TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS SEJAK DINI\",\"authors\":\"Trisniawati Trisniawati, A. Rahayu, Nelly Rhosyida\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/jiv.1302.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to provide an overview of how the learning using origamasains can emerge fondness to mathematics and science subjects from the early age. The result of the study was expected to become the input for the upcoming learning and the reference for developing the learning at the basic level especially for the mathematics and science subjects. In order to get the accurate research result, the qualitative research method was employed. The data were analyzed using the data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data validity check procedures. The research was conducted in May - September 2018 at Jageran Yogyakarta early childhood school. The primary data being analyzed were the impression of the students to the given learning and the results of the interviews to the students. The finding showed that the students could learn better using the origamasains learning. In this first activity,80% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, while 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In this second activity 100% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity. Meanwhile in the third activity, 75% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In that third activity, the classroom’s good atmosphere was destructed by the crying from some students. \\n \\nReferences \\nCossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211-244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426838 \\nDepdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi mata pelajaran matematika. \\nElytasari, S. (2017). Esensi metode Montessori dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 3(1), 59-73. http://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/article/view/2045 \\nFajarwati, I. (2014). Konsep Montessori tentang pendidikan anak usia dini dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 37-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2014.111-03 \\nHijriati, H. (2017). Tahapan perkembangan kognitif pada masa early childhood. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(2), 33-49. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/issue/view/289. \\nKartono, K. (2007). Psikologi anak (Psikologi perkembangan). Bandung: Mandar Maju. \\nLang, R. & Iverson, P. W. (2016). Origami 5: Fifth international meeting of origami science, mathematics, and education. Florida, Amerika: CRC Press. \\nLillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893-1894. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362 \\nMariana, I. M. A. (2009). Hakikat IPA dan pendidikan IPA. Jakarta: PPPPTK Untuk Program BERMUTU. \\nMayer, E. R. (2003). Handbook of psychology, vol. 7 educational psychology 2003. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. \\nMoleong, L. J. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. \\nSanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Kencana. \\nSugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r & d. Bandung: Alfabeta. \\nSuherman, E. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: JICA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. \\nSusanti, L. (2013). Pembelajaran berbasis origami untuk meningkatkan visualisasi spasial dan kemampuan geometri siswa SMP. MATHEdunesa, 2(2). http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2697 \\nWestwood, P. (2004). Learning and learning difficulties: A handbook for teacher. Camberwell: Acer Press. \\nYusuf, S. (2014). Psikologi perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi\",\"volume\":\"308 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.1302.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.1302.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本研究旨在概述使用折纸的学习如何从早期开始对数学和科学科目产生喜爱。研究结果将为今后的学习提供参考,并为发展基础阶段特别是数学和科学学科的学习提供参考。为了得到准确的研究结果,本文采用了定性研究方法。采用数据收集、数据简化、数据呈现和数据有效性检验程序对数据进行分析。该研究于2018年5月至9月在日惹雅格兰幼儿学校进行。被分析的主要数据是学生对给定学习的印象和对学生的访谈结果。研究结果表明,学生可以通过折纸学习更好地学习。在第一个活动中,80%的学生对给定的学习活动表示喜欢,20%的学生表示一般印象,0%的学生表示不喜欢。在第二项活动中,100%的学生表示喜欢所给的学习活动。同时,在第三次活动中,75%的学生对给定的学习活动表示喜欢,20%的学生表示一般印象,0%的学生表示不喜欢。在第三次活动中,教室的良好气氛被一些学生的哭声破坏了。cosentino, J.(2005)。仪式化专业知识:蒙台梭利方法的非蒙台梭利观点。教育学刊,2011(2),211-244。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426838 Depdiknas。(2006)。Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan national No. 22 (2006) tentang standard is mata pelajaran matematika。Elytasari, S.(2017)。esseni方法蒙台梭利dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini。生物医学工程学报,3(1),59-73。http://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/article/view/2045 Fajarwati, I.(2014)。康赛普·蒙台梭利,对伊斯兰教的看法。伊斯兰医学学报,11(1),37-52。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2014.111-03 Hijriati, H.(2017)。Tahapan perkembangan kognitif pada masa幼儿。植物学报,1(2),33-49。https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/issue/view/289。Kartono, K.(2007)。Psikologi anak (Psikologi perkembangan)。万隆:曼陀罗。Lang, R. & Iverson, P. W.(2016)。第五届国际折纸科学、数学和教育会议。佛罗里达州,美国:CRC出版社。利拉德,A.和埃尔斯-奎斯特,N.(2006)。早期教育:评价蒙台梭利教育。科学,313(5795),1893-1894。doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362 Mariana, i.m.a.(2009)。Hakikat IPA和pendidikan IPA。雅加达:PPPPTK Untuk计划BERMUTU。Mayer, E. R.(2003)。《心理学手册》第七卷,教育心理学2003。霍博肯:约翰威利父子公司。Moleong, l.j.(2005)。方法论penelitian质论。万隆:PT Remaja Rosdakarya。Sanjaya, W.(2009)。战略的发展方向:标准进程的发展方向。雅加达:肯卡纳。Sugiyono。(2011)。方法:定量、定性和研发。万隆:Alfabeta。Suherman, E.(2003)。策略:pembelajaran matematika kontemporer。万隆:印尼JICA Pendidikan大学。苏姗蒂,L.(2013)。折纸的基础,折纸的结构,折纸的形状,折纸的几何形状,折纸的几何形状。MATHEdunesa 2(2)。http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2697韦斯特伍德,P.(2004)。学习与学习困难:教师手册。坎伯韦尔:宏碁出版社。Yusuf, S.(2014)。心理学的研究。万隆:PT Remaja Rosdakarya。
IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN ORIGAMASAINS UNTUK MENUMBUHKAN KECINTAAN TERHADAP MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS SEJAK DINI
This study aims to provide an overview of how the learning using origamasains can emerge fondness to mathematics and science subjects from the early age. The result of the study was expected to become the input for the upcoming learning and the reference for developing the learning at the basic level especially for the mathematics and science subjects. In order to get the accurate research result, the qualitative research method was employed. The data were analyzed using the data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and data validity check procedures. The research was conducted in May - September 2018 at Jageran Yogyakarta early childhood school. The primary data being analyzed were the impression of the students to the given learning and the results of the interviews to the students. The finding showed that the students could learn better using the origamasains learning. In this first activity,80% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, while 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In this second activity 100% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity. Meanwhile in the third activity, 75% of the students showed fondness to the given learning activity, 20% of the students expressed normal impressions and 0% of the students showed dislike. In that third activity, the classroom’s good atmosphere was destructed by the crying from some students.
References
Cossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211-244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/426838
Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi mata pelajaran matematika.
Elytasari, S. (2017). Esensi metode Montessori dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 3(1), 59-73. http://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/article/view/2045
Fajarwati, I. (2014). Konsep Montessori tentang pendidikan anak usia dini dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(1), 37-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2014.111-03
Hijriati, H. (2017). Tahapan perkembangan kognitif pada masa early childhood. Bunayya: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(2), 33-49. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/bunayya/issue/view/289.
Kartono, K. (2007). Psikologi anak (Psikologi perkembangan). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Lang, R. & Iverson, P. W. (2016). Origami 5: Fifth international meeting of origami science, mathematics, and education. Florida, Amerika: CRC Press.
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893-1894. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362
Mariana, I. M. A. (2009). Hakikat IPA dan pendidikan IPA. Jakarta: PPPPTK Untuk Program BERMUTU.
Mayer, E. R. (2003). Handbook of psychology, vol. 7 educational psychology 2003. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Kencana.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r & d. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suherman, E. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer. Bandung: JICA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Susanti, L. (2013). Pembelajaran berbasis origami untuk meningkatkan visualisasi spasial dan kemampuan geometri siswa SMP. MATHEdunesa, 2(2). http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2697
Westwood, P. (2004). Learning and learning difficulties: A handbook for teacher. Camberwell: Acer Press.
Yusuf, S. (2014). Psikologi perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.