{"title":"ADI-FDTD方法的分割误差缩减","authors":"I. Ahmed, Z. Chen","doi":"10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ADI-FDTD method has attracted much attention for its unconditional stability and efficient simulations in the time domain with large time-steps. However, the associated errors are found to be relatively large in comparisons with another unconditionally stable FDTD scheme, the Crank-Nicolson (CN) technique, although the ADI-FDTD method presents higher computational efficiency. In this paper, we propose new ADI-FDTD methods that are based on the CN method but with the computational efficiency similar to that of the original ADI scheme. Numerical results are used to validate the methods.","PeriodicalId":407683,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splitting error reductions for the ADI-FDTD method\",\"authors\":\"I. Ahmed, Z. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ADI-FDTD method has attracted much attention for its unconditional stability and efficient simulations in the time domain with large time-steps. However, the associated errors are found to be relatively large in comparisons with another unconditionally stable FDTD scheme, the Crank-Nicolson (CN) technique, although the ADI-FDTD method presents higher computational efficiency. In this paper, we propose new ADI-FDTD methods that are based on the CN method but with the computational efficiency similar to that of the original ADI scheme. Numerical results are used to validate the methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Splitting error reductions for the ADI-FDTD method
The ADI-FDTD method has attracted much attention for its unconditional stability and efficient simulations in the time domain with large time-steps. However, the associated errors are found to be relatively large in comparisons with another unconditionally stable FDTD scheme, the Crank-Nicolson (CN) technique, although the ADI-FDTD method presents higher computational efficiency. In this paper, we propose new ADI-FDTD methods that are based on the CN method but with the computational efficiency similar to that of the original ADI scheme. Numerical results are used to validate the methods.