无国籍是狡猾的治国之术的产物:当前原因、行动者和辩论的全球治理观点

Allison J. Petrozziello
{"title":"无国籍是狡猾的治国之术的产物:当前原因、行动者和辩论的全球治理观点","authors":"Allison J. Petrozziello","doi":"10.35715/scr1001.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statelessness has been described as the result of unintentional gaps between citizenship policies excluding individuals who move, form relationships and reproduce across international borders. But what if the rise in statelessness is not a technicality, but a strategy of slippery statecraft meant to design the citizenry a given state is willing to protect? This paper places statelessness within the context of neoliberal globalisation and international migration and provides a critical global governance view of contemporary causes of statelessness, key actors working on it and their framing of the issue within global governance frameworks. I argue that the dominant framing of statelessness as a technical issue obviates the politics behind statelessness as slippery statecraft, leading proposed solutions to fall short. Critical research may help advocates make the case for inclusion, appealing to broader state interests and networks, without abandoning attendant human rights obligations.","PeriodicalId":184851,"journal":{"name":"Statelessness & Citizenship Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statelessness as a Product of Slippery Statecraft: A Global Governance View of Current Causes, Actors, and Debates\",\"authors\":\"Allison J. Petrozziello\",\"doi\":\"10.35715/scr1001.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statelessness has been described as the result of unintentional gaps between citizenship policies excluding individuals who move, form relationships and reproduce across international borders. But what if the rise in statelessness is not a technicality, but a strategy of slippery statecraft meant to design the citizenry a given state is willing to protect? This paper places statelessness within the context of neoliberal globalisation and international migration and provides a critical global governance view of contemporary causes of statelessness, key actors working on it and their framing of the issue within global governance frameworks. I argue that the dominant framing of statelessness as a technical issue obviates the politics behind statelessness as slippery statecraft, leading proposed solutions to fall short. Critical research may help advocates make the case for inclusion, appealing to broader state interests and networks, without abandoning attendant human rights obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statelessness & Citizenship Review\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statelessness & Citizenship Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35715/scr1001.116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statelessness & Citizenship Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35715/scr1001.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

无国籍状态被描述为公民政策之间无意的差距的结果,不包括跨国界移动、建立关系和生育的个人。但是,如果无国籍现象的增加不是一个技术问题,而是一种狡猾的治国策略,旨在设计一个特定国家愿意保护的公民,那该怎么办?本文将无国籍状态置于新自由主义全球化和国际移民的背景下,并提供了当代无国籍原因的关键全球治理观点,以及在全球治理框架内工作的关键参与者及其问题的框架。我认为,将无国籍作为一个技术问题的主流框架,排除了无国籍背后的政治,认为这是一种狡猾的治国方术,导致提出的解决方案达不到要求。批判性研究可能有助于倡导者提出包容的理由,呼吁更广泛的国家利益和网络,同时不放弃随之而来的人权义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statelessness as a Product of Slippery Statecraft: A Global Governance View of Current Causes, Actors, and Debates
Statelessness has been described as the result of unintentional gaps between citizenship policies excluding individuals who move, form relationships and reproduce across international borders. But what if the rise in statelessness is not a technicality, but a strategy of slippery statecraft meant to design the citizenry a given state is willing to protect? This paper places statelessness within the context of neoliberal globalisation and international migration and provides a critical global governance view of contemporary causes of statelessness, key actors working on it and their framing of the issue within global governance frameworks. I argue that the dominant framing of statelessness as a technical issue obviates the politics behind statelessness as slippery statecraft, leading proposed solutions to fall short. Critical research may help advocates make the case for inclusion, appealing to broader state interests and networks, without abandoning attendant human rights obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信