生态治理与中国上市公司可持续发展报告的独立保证

John Margerison, J. Liao, Hongtao Shen
{"title":"生态治理与中国上市公司可持续发展报告的独立保证","authors":"John Margerison, J. Liao, Hongtao Shen","doi":"10.31031/siam.2020.01.000513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to examine independent assurance of sustainability reports in a major emerging economy - China. It draws on a theory of ecological governance which offers models, one of which China’s governance model appears to fit. Desk based research has been used to establish the take-up of independent assurance by all Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2015. The findings are that the take-up of independent assurance by Chinese listed companies has been very low and was falling in 2015. Companies using independent assurance do not fit into the typical types identified by previous Western research and are dominated by financial companies. The key explanation for the low take-up is that Chinese governance based on ecological authoritarianism exercised by the government has little need for public exercises in legitimation such as independent assurance. The practical implications are that through understanding of governance mechanisms in an authoritarian model such as China’s this leads to understanding about a different approach to ecological governance. The paper is original in that it looks at independent assurance in China from a new perspective with emphasis on absence of such assurance, rather than statistical analysis of determinants.","PeriodicalId":158514,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Accounting and Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological Governance and the Independent Assurance of Sustainability Reporting by Chinese Listed Companies\",\"authors\":\"John Margerison, J. Liao, Hongtao Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.31031/siam.2020.01.000513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to examine independent assurance of sustainability reports in a major emerging economy - China. It draws on a theory of ecological governance which offers models, one of which China’s governance model appears to fit. Desk based research has been used to establish the take-up of independent assurance by all Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2015. The findings are that the take-up of independent assurance by Chinese listed companies has been very low and was falling in 2015. Companies using independent assurance do not fit into the typical types identified by previous Western research and are dominated by financial companies. The key explanation for the low take-up is that Chinese governance based on ecological authoritarianism exercised by the government has little need for public exercises in legitimation such as independent assurance. The practical implications are that through understanding of governance mechanisms in an authoritarian model such as China’s this leads to understanding about a different approach to ecological governance. The paper is original in that it looks at independent assurance in China from a new perspective with emphasis on absence of such assurance, rather than statistical analysis of determinants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Accounting and Management\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Accounting and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31031/siam.2020.01.000513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/siam.2020.01.000513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是研究可持续发展报告的独立保证在一个主要的新兴经济体-中国。它借鉴了一种生态治理理论,提供了一种模式,其中一种模式似乎适合中国的治理模式。本文采用桌面研究的方法建立了2003 - 2015年中国所有上市公司独立鉴证的使用情况。调查结果显示,中国上市公司对独立鉴证的接受程度一直很低,而且在2015年呈下降趋势。使用独立担保的公司不属于西方先前研究确定的典型类型,主要是金融公司。对这种低接受度的关键解释是,中国政府基于生态威权主义的治理,几乎不需要独立保证等公众行为的合法性。实践意义在于,通过理解中国等威权模式下的治理机制,我们可以理解一种不同的生态治理方法。这篇论文的独创之处在于,它从一个新的角度看待中国的独立保证,强调缺乏这种保证,而不是对决定因素的统计分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological Governance and the Independent Assurance of Sustainability Reporting by Chinese Listed Companies
The purpose of this paper is to examine independent assurance of sustainability reports in a major emerging economy - China. It draws on a theory of ecological governance which offers models, one of which China’s governance model appears to fit. Desk based research has been used to establish the take-up of independent assurance by all Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2015. The findings are that the take-up of independent assurance by Chinese listed companies has been very low and was falling in 2015. Companies using independent assurance do not fit into the typical types identified by previous Western research and are dominated by financial companies. The key explanation for the low take-up is that Chinese governance based on ecological authoritarianism exercised by the government has little need for public exercises in legitimation such as independent assurance. The practical implications are that through understanding of governance mechanisms in an authoritarian model such as China’s this leads to understanding about a different approach to ecological governance. The paper is original in that it looks at independent assurance in China from a new perspective with emphasis on absence of such assurance, rather than statistical analysis of determinants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信