黑暗模式,隐私和LGPD

Luiza Jarovsky
{"title":"黑暗模式,隐私和LGPD","authors":"Luiza Jarovsky","doi":"10.54648/gplr2021016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the topic of dark patterns in personal data collection (DPPDC), arguing that they are still under the radar of lawmakers and privacy advocates, and that data protection laws such as the Brazilian Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) do not offer enough protection against it. The article presents the general concept of dark patterns, followed by a legal analysis of DPPDC, highlighting that their prevalence is made possible by the outdated decision making model tacitly endorsed by data protection laws. To illustrate this argument, I examine the recently enacted LGPD, which emphasizes data subjects’ autonomy without offering additional protection against malicious actors’ commonly used techniques. Turning to the legal text, I inquire whether DPPDC can be deemed legal or not given the LGPD’s current provisions regarding lawfulness of data processing. Lastly, after identifying the legal gaps that enable DPPDC to flourish, I argue that data protection law needs a paradigm change, so that data subjects can be guaranteed a fair decision making process and adequate levels of protection of their privacy.\nDark Patterns, Data Protection, Brazil, Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Fairness, Privacy","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dark Patterns, Privacy and the LGPD\",\"authors\":\"Luiza Jarovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gplr2021016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the topic of dark patterns in personal data collection (DPPDC), arguing that they are still under the radar of lawmakers and privacy advocates, and that data protection laws such as the Brazilian Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) do not offer enough protection against it. The article presents the general concept of dark patterns, followed by a legal analysis of DPPDC, highlighting that their prevalence is made possible by the outdated decision making model tacitly endorsed by data protection laws. To illustrate this argument, I examine the recently enacted LGPD, which emphasizes data subjects’ autonomy without offering additional protection against malicious actors’ commonly used techniques. Turning to the legal text, I inquire whether DPPDC can be deemed legal or not given the LGPD’s current provisions regarding lawfulness of data processing. Lastly, after identifying the legal gaps that enable DPPDC to flourish, I argue that data protection law needs a paradigm change, so that data subjects can be guaranteed a fair decision making process and adequate levels of protection of their privacy.\\nDark Patterns, Data Protection, Brazil, Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Fairness, Privacy\",\"PeriodicalId\":127582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Privacy Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了个人数据收集中的黑暗模式(DPPDC)这一主题,认为它们仍然处于立法者和隐私倡导者的雷达之下,而巴西Lei general de protealo de Dados (LGPD)等数据保护法并未提供足够的保护。本文介绍了暗模式的一般概念,然后对DPPDC进行了法律分析,强调暗模式的流行是由数据保护法默认的过时决策模型造成的。为了说明这一论点,我研究了最近颁布的LGPD,它强调数据主体的自主权,但没有提供针对恶意行为者常用技术的额外保护。转到法律文本,我询问DPPDC是否可以被认为是合法的,鉴于LGPD目前关于数据处理合法性的规定。最后,在确定了使DPPDC蓬勃发展的法律空白之后,我认为数据保护法需要改变范式,以便数据主体可以保证公平的决策过程和对其隐私的充分保护。黑暗模式,数据保护,巴西,Lei General de Protection o de Dados (LGPD),通用数据保护条例(GDPR),公平,隐私
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dark Patterns, Privacy and the LGPD
This article deals with the topic of dark patterns in personal data collection (DPPDC), arguing that they are still under the radar of lawmakers and privacy advocates, and that data protection laws such as the Brazilian Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) do not offer enough protection against it. The article presents the general concept of dark patterns, followed by a legal analysis of DPPDC, highlighting that their prevalence is made possible by the outdated decision making model tacitly endorsed by data protection laws. To illustrate this argument, I examine the recently enacted LGPD, which emphasizes data subjects’ autonomy without offering additional protection against malicious actors’ commonly used techniques. Turning to the legal text, I inquire whether DPPDC can be deemed legal or not given the LGPD’s current provisions regarding lawfulness of data processing. Lastly, after identifying the legal gaps that enable DPPDC to flourish, I argue that data protection law needs a paradigm change, so that data subjects can be guaranteed a fair decision making process and adequate levels of protection of their privacy. Dark Patterns, Data Protection, Brazil, Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Fairness, Privacy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信