{"title":"社会冲突的种族成分:解释的概念差距","authors":"O. Persidskaya","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various terms that are most often used in scientific literature when describing conflicts between representa-tives of different ethnic groups are considered. The conceptual gaps in the interpretation of these terms are revealed: categorical synonymy, theoretical and methodological reduction, epistemological isolation and ideological burden. To solve this epistemological difficulty, it is proposed to abandon a single term, but to focus on the analysis of social conflict, revealing its diverse ethnic component.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETHNIC COMPONENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICT: CONCEPTUAL GAPS OF INTERPRETATION\",\"authors\":\"O. Persidskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various terms that are most often used in scientific literature when describing conflicts between representa-tives of different ethnic groups are considered. The conceptual gaps in the interpretation of these terms are revealed: categorical synonymy, theoretical and methodological reduction, epistemological isolation and ideological burden. To solve this epistemological difficulty, it is proposed to abandon a single term, but to focus on the analysis of social conflict, revealing its diverse ethnic component.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ETHNIC COMPONENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICT: CONCEPTUAL GAPS OF INTERPRETATION
Various terms that are most often used in scientific literature when describing conflicts between representa-tives of different ethnic groups are considered. The conceptual gaps in the interpretation of these terms are revealed: categorical synonymy, theoretical and methodological reduction, epistemological isolation and ideological burden. To solve this epistemological difficulty, it is proposed to abandon a single term, but to focus on the analysis of social conflict, revealing its diverse ethnic component.