改变指纹检测-算法性能评估

Rudolf Haraksim, Alexandre Anthonioz, C. Champod, M. Olsen, John Ellingsgaard, C. Busch
{"title":"改变指纹检测-算法性能评估","authors":"Rudolf Haraksim, Alexandre Anthonioz, C. Champod, M. Olsen, John Ellingsgaard, C. Busch","doi":"10.1109/IWBF.2016.7449673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to present a comparative study on the performance of altered fingerprint detection algorithms. Different algorithms from different institutions have been evaluated on two different datasets. Both datasets feature real alterations on fingers and the ground truth regarding the alteration is known a priori, as, in some cases, corresponding pre-altered fingerprints were also available. The performance obtained on both datasets produced by either reference state-of-the-art or custom-built algorithms is higher than the reported 10% EER from previous studies [1].","PeriodicalId":282164,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered fingerprint detection – algorithm performance evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Rudolf Haraksim, Alexandre Anthonioz, C. Champod, M. Olsen, John Ellingsgaard, C. Busch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWBF.2016.7449673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to present a comparative study on the performance of altered fingerprint detection algorithms. Different algorithms from different institutions have been evaluated on two different datasets. Both datasets feature real alterations on fingers and the ground truth regarding the alteration is known a priori, as, in some cases, corresponding pre-altered fingerprints were also available. The performance obtained on both datasets produced by either reference state-of-the-art or custom-built algorithms is higher than the reported 10% EER from previous studies [1].\",\"PeriodicalId\":282164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2016.7449673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2016.7449673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的目的是对改变指纹检测算法的性能进行比较研究。来自不同机构的不同算法已经在两个不同的数据集上进行了评估。这两个数据集都具有手指的真实变化,并且关于变化的基本事实是先验的,因为在某些情况下,相应的预改变指纹也可用。在两个数据集上获得的性能,无论是参考的最先进的还是定制的算法,都高于先前研究报告的10%的EER[10]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altered fingerprint detection – algorithm performance evaluation
The purpose of this paper is to present a comparative study on the performance of altered fingerprint detection algorithms. Different algorithms from different institutions have been evaluated on two different datasets. Both datasets feature real alterations on fingers and the ground truth regarding the alteration is known a priori, as, in some cases, corresponding pre-altered fingerprints were also available. The performance obtained on both datasets produced by either reference state-of-the-art or custom-built algorithms is higher than the reported 10% EER from previous studies [1].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信