一种计算优选扩展的新方法

Xindi Zhang, Xiaojie Xie, Yancen Pan, Dangdang Niu, Shuai Lü
{"title":"一种计算优选扩展的新方法","authors":"Xindi Zhang, Xiaojie Xie, Yancen Pan, Dangdang Niu, Shuai Lü","doi":"10.1145/3144789.3144796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preferred semantics is one of the most important semantics in abstract argumentation. This paper designed a new algorithm, named ACPE, for computing preferred extensions based on SAT approach. Firstly, Algorithm ACPE searches for admissible extensions by converting admissible semantic into CNF formula and invoking SAT solver to solve this formula. After finding a new admissible extension, ACPE will get a complete extension by a strategy of expanding, after which ACPE adds a constraint formulae to the CNF formulae to avoid any subset of this extension to be found in searching for a new admissible extension. ACPE execute the above procedure repeatedly until it cannot find any admissible extensions by calling SAT solver. At last, ACPE found all maximum complete extensions or, that is to say, preferred extensions. Through theoretical analysis, this paper proved the correctness and completeness of ACPE. To analyze the performance of ACPE, we compared it with other three solvers, Cegartix, ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, ranking the top three fast solver of computing enumeration reasoning problems for preferred semantics in international competition ICCMA'15. The result of experiment shows that the efficiency of ACPE is similar with ArgSemSAT and Cegartix but weaker than CoQuiAAS when solving easy problems; when it comes to hard problem, ACPE is generally better than ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, and better than Cegartix for most instances.","PeriodicalId":254163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Method for Computing Preferred Extensions\",\"authors\":\"Xindi Zhang, Xiaojie Xie, Yancen Pan, Dangdang Niu, Shuai Lü\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3144789.3144796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preferred semantics is one of the most important semantics in abstract argumentation. This paper designed a new algorithm, named ACPE, for computing preferred extensions based on SAT approach. Firstly, Algorithm ACPE searches for admissible extensions by converting admissible semantic into CNF formula and invoking SAT solver to solve this formula. After finding a new admissible extension, ACPE will get a complete extension by a strategy of expanding, after which ACPE adds a constraint formulae to the CNF formulae to avoid any subset of this extension to be found in searching for a new admissible extension. ACPE execute the above procedure repeatedly until it cannot find any admissible extensions by calling SAT solver. At last, ACPE found all maximum complete extensions or, that is to say, preferred extensions. Through theoretical analysis, this paper proved the correctness and completeness of ACPE. To analyze the performance of ACPE, we compared it with other three solvers, Cegartix, ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, ranking the top three fast solver of computing enumeration reasoning problems for preferred semantics in international competition ICCMA'15. The result of experiment shows that the efficiency of ACPE is similar with ArgSemSAT and Cegartix but weaker than CoQuiAAS when solving easy problems; when it comes to hard problem, ACPE is generally better than ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, and better than Cegartix for most instances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3144789.3144796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3144789.3144796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首选语义是抽象论证中最重要的语义之一。本文在SAT方法的基础上设计了一种计算首选扩展的新算法ACPE。首先,ACPE算法通过将可接受语义转换为CNF公式并调用SAT求解器求解该公式来搜索可接受扩展。在找到新的可容许扩展后,ACPE将通过展开策略得到一个完全扩展,然后在CNF公式中加入一个约束公式,以避免在搜索新的可容许扩展时发现该扩展的任何子集。ACPE反复执行上述过程,直到调用SAT求解器无法找到任何可接受的扩展。最后,ACPE找到了所有最大完全扩展,即优选扩展。通过理论分析,证明了ACPE的正确性和完备性。为了分析ACPE的性能,我们将其与国际竞赛ICCMA'15中排名前三的优先语义计算枚举推理问题快速求解器Cegartix、ArgSemSAT和CoQuiAAS进行了比较。实验结果表明,在求解简单问题时,ACPE的效率与ArgSemSAT和Cegartix相当,但低于CoQuiAAS;当涉及到难题时,ACPE通常优于ArgSemSAT和CoQuiAAS,并且在大多数情况下优于Cegartix。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A New Method for Computing Preferred Extensions
Preferred semantics is one of the most important semantics in abstract argumentation. This paper designed a new algorithm, named ACPE, for computing preferred extensions based on SAT approach. Firstly, Algorithm ACPE searches for admissible extensions by converting admissible semantic into CNF formula and invoking SAT solver to solve this formula. After finding a new admissible extension, ACPE will get a complete extension by a strategy of expanding, after which ACPE adds a constraint formulae to the CNF formulae to avoid any subset of this extension to be found in searching for a new admissible extension. ACPE execute the above procedure repeatedly until it cannot find any admissible extensions by calling SAT solver. At last, ACPE found all maximum complete extensions or, that is to say, preferred extensions. Through theoretical analysis, this paper proved the correctness and completeness of ACPE. To analyze the performance of ACPE, we compared it with other three solvers, Cegartix, ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, ranking the top three fast solver of computing enumeration reasoning problems for preferred semantics in international competition ICCMA'15. The result of experiment shows that the efficiency of ACPE is similar with ArgSemSAT and Cegartix but weaker than CoQuiAAS when solving easy problems; when it comes to hard problem, ACPE is generally better than ArgSemSAT and CoQuiAAS, and better than Cegartix for most instances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信