恐怖主义与爱国投资者:来自1920年华尔街爆炸案的证据

D. Jansen
{"title":"恐怖主义与爱国投资者:来自1920年华尔街爆炸案的证据","authors":"D. Jansen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3852564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that patriotism does not necessarily account for market resilience in the face of terror. Studying the 1920 Wall Street bombing, I find that rallying-around-the-flag does not explain the upbeat nature of the first trading session after the attack. In fact, NYSE-traded firms with patriotic terms (such as \"American'' or \"U.S.'') in their name underperformed by 1 percentage point. The absence of a clear international actor behind the attack may explain the absence of patriotic trading. I also point out an alternative, economic reason for the upbeat market, which centers around Mexican Petroleum’s postponement of its ex-dividend date.","PeriodicalId":260048,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terrorism and Patriotic Investors: Evidence from the 1920 Wall Street Bombing\",\"authors\":\"D. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3852564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that patriotism does not necessarily account for market resilience in the face of terror. Studying the 1920 Wall Street bombing, I find that rallying-around-the-flag does not explain the upbeat nature of the first trading session after the attack. In fact, NYSE-traded firms with patriotic terms (such as \\\"American'' or \\\"U.S.'') in their name underperformed by 1 percentage point. The absence of a clear international actor behind the attack may explain the absence of patriotic trading. I also point out an alternative, economic reason for the upbeat market, which centers around Mexican Petroleum’s postponement of its ex-dividend date.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,面对恐怖主义,爱国主义不一定能解释市场的弹性。研究1920年华尔街爆炸案后,我发现团结一致并不能解释袭击后第一个交易时段的乐观性质。事实上,在纽约证券交易所交易的公司,其名称中带有爱国主义字眼(如“美国”或“美国”),其表现落后1个百分点。这次袭击背后没有一个明确的国际行动者,这或许可以解释爱国主义交易的缺失。我还指出了市场乐观的另一个经济原因,主要原因是墨西哥石油公司推迟了除息日期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Terrorism and Patriotic Investors: Evidence from the 1920 Wall Street Bombing
This paper argues that patriotism does not necessarily account for market resilience in the face of terror. Studying the 1920 Wall Street bombing, I find that rallying-around-the-flag does not explain the upbeat nature of the first trading session after the attack. In fact, NYSE-traded firms with patriotic terms (such as "American'' or "U.S.'') in their name underperformed by 1 percentage point. The absence of a clear international actor behind the attack may explain the absence of patriotic trading. I also point out an alternative, economic reason for the upbeat market, which centers around Mexican Petroleum’s postponement of its ex-dividend date.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信