在研论文:依赖性对概率时序分析和任务调度的影响分析

E. Mezzetti, J. Abella, Carles Hernández, F. Cazorla
{"title":"在研论文:依赖性对概率时序分析和任务调度的影响分析","authors":"E. Mezzetti, J. Abella, Carles Hernández, F. Cazorla","doi":"10.1109/RTSS.2017.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been a renewed interest for probabilistic timing analysis (PTA) and probabilistic task scheduling (PTS). Despite the number of works in both fields, the link between them is weak: works on the latter build upon a series of assumptions on the probabilistic behavior of each task – or instances (jobs) of it – that have not been shown how to be fulfilled by PTA. This paper makes a first step towards covering this gap with emphasis on providing the right meaning of pWCET estimate as understood by both PTA and PTS. We show that the main issue related to ensuring that PTS assumptions on pWCET estimates are captured by PTA relates to the dependencies among tasks, and even jobs of a given task. Both change the scope of applicability of pWCET estimates provided by PTA and hence, their use by PTS.","PeriodicalId":407932,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-in-Progress Paper: An Analysis of the Impact of Dependencies on Probabilistic Timing Analysis and Task Scheduling\",\"authors\":\"E. Mezzetti, J. Abella, Carles Hernández, F. Cazorla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RTSS.2017.00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently there has been a renewed interest for probabilistic timing analysis (PTA) and probabilistic task scheduling (PTS). Despite the number of works in both fields, the link between them is weak: works on the latter build upon a series of assumptions on the probabilistic behavior of each task – or instances (jobs) of it – that have not been shown how to be fulfilled by PTA. This paper makes a first step towards covering this gap with emphasis on providing the right meaning of pWCET estimate as understood by both PTA and PTS. We show that the main issue related to ensuring that PTS assumptions on pWCET estimates are captured by PTA relates to the dependencies among tasks, and even jobs of a given task. Both change the scope of applicability of pWCET estimates provided by PTA and hence, their use by PTS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2017.00042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2017.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近,人们对概率时序分析(PTA)和概率任务调度(PTS)重新产生了兴趣。尽管在这两个领域都有大量的研究,但它们之间的联系很弱:后者的研究建立在对每个任务(或其实例(工作))的概率行为的一系列假设之上,而这些假设尚未表明PTA如何实现。本文通过强调提供PTA和PTS所理解的pWCET估计的正确含义,为弥补这一差距迈出了第一步。我们表明,与确保PTA捕获pWCET估计的PTS假设相关的主要问题与任务之间的依赖关系有关,甚至与给定任务的作业有关。两者都改变了PTA提供的pWCET评估的适用范围,从而改变了PTS对其的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work-in-Progress Paper: An Analysis of the Impact of Dependencies on Probabilistic Timing Analysis and Task Scheduling
Recently there has been a renewed interest for probabilistic timing analysis (PTA) and probabilistic task scheduling (PTS). Despite the number of works in both fields, the link between them is weak: works on the latter build upon a series of assumptions on the probabilistic behavior of each task – or instances (jobs) of it – that have not been shown how to be fulfilled by PTA. This paper makes a first step towards covering this gap with emphasis on providing the right meaning of pWCET estimate as understood by both PTA and PTS. We show that the main issue related to ensuring that PTS assumptions on pWCET estimates are captured by PTA relates to the dependencies among tasks, and even jobs of a given task. Both change the scope of applicability of pWCET estimates provided by PTA and hence, their use by PTS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信