参与中国农村宅基地置换——从成都与诸城市的比较看

2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP) Pub Date : 2012-06-17 DOI:10.1109/IACP.2012.6342988

Ziming Li, Lei Wang

{"title":"参与中国农村宅基地置换——从成都与诸城市的比较看","authors":"Ziming Li, Lei Wang","doi":"10.1109/IACP.2012.6342988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By comparing the distinct institutional arrangements of two areas within the context of land-dependent local fiscal pattern in China, this paper uses an incentive compatibility mechanism to explain the success experienced in Chengdu and the failure of Zhucheng. And it uncovers the key of Chengdu's case is the comprehensive participation including concerns for the rural households' better-off life in the reform in particular.","PeriodicalId":125711,"journal":{"name":"2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP)","volume":"35 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation in China's rural homestead replacement From a comparison between the practices of Chengdu and Zhucheng\",\"authors\":\"Ziming Li, Lei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IACP.2012.6342988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By comparing the distinct institutional arrangements of two areas within the context of land-dependent local fiscal pattern in China, this paper uses an incentive compatibility mechanism to explain the success experienced in Chengdu and the failure of Zhucheng. And it uncovers the key of Chengdu's case is the comprehensive participation including concerns for the rural households' better-off life in the reform in particular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP)\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IACP.2012.6342988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IACP.2012.6342988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过比较中国土地依赖型地方财政模式下两地不同的制度安排，运用激励相容机制来解释成都的成功和诸城的失败。成都案例的关键在于全面参与，特别是对农村家庭小康生活的关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Participation in China's rural homestead replacement From a comparison between the practices of Chengdu and Zhucheng

By comparing the distinct institutional arrangements of two areas within the context of land-dependent local fiscal pattern in China, this paper uses an incentive compatibility mechanism to explain the success experienced in Chengdu and the failure of Zhucheng. And it uncovers the key of Chengdu's case is the comprehensive participation including concerns for the rural households' better-off life in the reform in particular.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2012 6th International Association for China Planning Conference (IACP)

自引率

0.00%

发文量