S. Pawłowski
{"title":"Wykonywanie zawodu lekarza przez cudzoziemca niebędącego obywatelem państwa członkowskiego UE a znajomość języka polskiego","authors":"S. Pawłowski","doi":"10.14746/spp.2022.1.37.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practising as a physician, especially during the pandemic, was of interest to the legislator several times due to staff shortages and more. The pandemic also forced changes in many paradigms of providing healthcare services. One of them, con-tained in the so-called ‘Special Covid Act’, was to simplify the acquisition of right to practise as a doctor by a foreigner who is not a citizen of a European Union Member State. The study focuses on one of the facilitations introduced: relinquishment of the four-stage examination on knowledge of the Polish language in favor of submitting a statement on the command of the Polish in speech and writing to the extent neces-sary to practise as a doctor, i.e. resignation from an objective, verifiable assessment, in favor of a civil law declaration will, in principle not verifiable at the time of sub-mission. This solution raises a number of doubts and carries the risk of a medical error. First and foremost, a medical interview, one of the key and initial stages of treatment initiation, becomes impossible to conduct. Secondly, it is also difficult to communicate with other medical personnel. Thirdly, it is doubtful whether another statutory obligation will be fulfilled, namely providing information to the patient about their state of health and obtaining consent for treatment. The mechanism of supervision by another doctor who speaks Polish should also be considered insuf-ficient, as due to the lack of such personnel, it will often be impossible to meet this condition. These and other reasons support a negative assessment of the solutions introduced. A much better solution would be to provide intensive learning of the Polish language, a solution that is proven and used successfully. Referring to the language of the EU directives on the recognition of professional qualifications, it is a “reasonable and necessary” direction.","PeriodicalId":176818,"journal":{"name":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","volume":"275 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Prawa Publicznego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/spp.2022.1.37.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于工作人员短缺等原因,立法者多次对行医感兴趣,特别是在大流行病期间。大流行病还迫使许多提供保健服务的范例发生变化。其中之一包含在所谓的“特别Covid法案”中,旨在简化非欧盟成员国公民的外国人获得医生执业权的程序。这项研究的重点是所采取的便利措施之一:放弃对波兰语知识的四阶段考试,而提出一份关于波兰语的口头和书面能力的陈述,以达到作为医生执业所必需的程度,即放弃客观的、可核查的评估,而提出一份民法声明,原则上在提交时是不可核查的。这一解决方案引发了许多疑问,并带来了医疗差错的风险。首先,作为治疗开始的关键和初始阶段之一的医疗面谈变得不可能进行。其次,与其他医务人员沟通也很困难。第三,是否会履行另一项法定义务,即向患者提供有关其健康状况的信息并获得治疗同意,这一点值得怀疑。由另一名讲波兰语的医生监督的机制也应该被认为是不够的,因为由于缺乏这样的人员,往往不可能满足这一条件。这些和其他原因支持对所提出的解决办法作出消极评价。一个更好的解决方案是提供波兰语的强化学习,这是一个经过验证并成功使用的解决方案。参照欧盟关于职业资格承认的指令语言,这是一个“合理和必要”的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wykonywanie zawodu lekarza przez cudzoziemca niebędącego obywatelem państwa członkowskiego UE a znajomość języka polskiego
Practising as a physician, especially during the pandemic, was of interest to the legislator several times due to staff shortages and more. The pandemic also forced changes in many paradigms of providing healthcare services. One of them, con-tained in the so-called ‘Special Covid Act’, was to simplify the acquisition of right to practise as a doctor by a foreigner who is not a citizen of a European Union Member State. The study focuses on one of the facilitations introduced: relinquishment of the four-stage examination on knowledge of the Polish language in favor of submitting a statement on the command of the Polish in speech and writing to the extent neces-sary to practise as a doctor, i.e. resignation from an objective, verifiable assessment, in favor of a civil law declaration will, in principle not verifiable at the time of sub-mission. This solution raises a number of doubts and carries the risk of a medical error. First and foremost, a medical interview, one of the key and initial stages of treatment initiation, becomes impossible to conduct. Secondly, it is also difficult to communicate with other medical personnel. Thirdly, it is doubtful whether another statutory obligation will be fulfilled, namely providing information to the patient about their state of health and obtaining consent for treatment. The mechanism of supervision by another doctor who speaks Polish should also be considered insuf-ficient, as due to the lack of such personnel, it will often be impossible to meet this condition. These and other reasons support a negative assessment of the solutions introduced. A much better solution would be to provide intensive learning of the Polish language, a solution that is proven and used successfully. Referring to the language of the EU directives on the recognition of professional qualifications, it is a “reasonable and necessary” direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信