SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)感染诊断中的挑战

M. Pal, M. Bulcha, Wakuma Mitiku Bune
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)感染诊断中的挑战","authors":"M. Pal, M. Bulcha, Wakuma Mitiku Bune","doi":"10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7","PeriodicalId":127077,"journal":{"name":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection\",\"authors\":\"M. Pal, M. Bulcha, Wakuma Mitiku Bune\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7\",\"PeriodicalId\":127077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MOJ Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MOJ Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只有通过检测生物样本中SARS-CoV-2的核酸含量(即RNA)才能进行COVID-19的病原学诊断,这几乎是这一明确内涵的逻辑结果。5,6尽管SARS-CoV-2核酸实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测已成为全球诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的金标准。然而,这些实时PCR检测试剂盒有一些缺点。除了样本收集和运输的限制,以及试剂盒结果,喉拭子样本的RT-PCR总体阳性率在首次呈现时估计在30%至60%之间。有两种类型的SARS-CoV-2实验:检测病毒本身的实验和检测宿主对病毒反应的实验。虽然病毒可以培养,但这是一个危险的过程,在临床实验室中不经常进行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection
The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信