多机器人任务分配问题的阿罗维安观点

W. Reis, G. S. Bastos
{"title":"多机器人任务分配问题的阿罗维安观点","authors":"W. Reis, G. S. Bastos","doi":"10.1109/ICAR.2017.8023622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the Multi-Robot Task Allocation (MRTA) problem from the perspective of Social Choice Theory. More specifically taking into account the conditions of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem in a robot collective preference aggregation. The scalar utility comparison between two robots becomes impractical with an inexact estimate. As argued by Arrow, the cardinal utility comparison can be replaced by an ordinal comparison. The work also examines two different MRTA problems from this Arrovian view, while establishing Multi-Robot Social Choice and Multi-Robot Social Welfare functions.","PeriodicalId":198633,"journal":{"name":"2017 18th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Arrovian view on the multi-robot task allocation problem\",\"authors\":\"W. Reis, G. S. Bastos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAR.2017.8023622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to analyze the Multi-Robot Task Allocation (MRTA) problem from the perspective of Social Choice Theory. More specifically taking into account the conditions of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem in a robot collective preference aggregation. The scalar utility comparison between two robots becomes impractical with an inexact estimate. As argued by Arrow, the cardinal utility comparison can be replaced by an ordinal comparison. The work also examines two different MRTA problems from this Arrovian view, while establishing Multi-Robot Social Choice and Multi-Robot Social Welfare functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 18th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 18th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR.2017.8023622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 18th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR.2017.8023622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在从社会选择理论的角度分析多机器人任务分配问题。更具体地说,考虑机器人集体偏好聚合中的阿罗不可能定理的条件。由于估计不准确,两个机器人之间的标量效用比较变得不切实际。正如阿罗所说,基数效用比较可以用序数比较代替。在建立多机器人社会选择和多机器人社会福利函数的同时,本文还从阿罗维安的观点出发,考察了两个不同的MRTA问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Arrovian view on the multi-robot task allocation problem
This paper aims to analyze the Multi-Robot Task Allocation (MRTA) problem from the perspective of Social Choice Theory. More specifically taking into account the conditions of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem in a robot collective preference aggregation. The scalar utility comparison between two robots becomes impractical with an inexact estimate. As argued by Arrow, the cardinal utility comparison can be replaced by an ordinal comparison. The work also examines two different MRTA problems from this Arrovian view, while establishing Multi-Robot Social Choice and Multi-Robot Social Welfare functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信