“比如欧洲”

S. Glendinning
{"title":"“比如欧洲”","authors":"S. Glendinning","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1773709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.","PeriodicalId":166384,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Europe, for Example'\",\"authors\":\"S. Glendinning\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1773709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1773709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Politics of Race (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1773709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

本文旨在说明,为什么对欧洲问题采取一种哲学上有根据的方法,至少会打断一种观点,这种观点是欧洲作为垂死世界观所在地的正统思想的基础;也就是说,对欧洲的解释是由一种政治文化主导的,这种文化从根本上受到一种令人震惊的、通常是含蓄的“种族理论”、“种族学”或潜在的“种族形而上学”的损害。这篇论文说明了为什么这种理所当然的理解是不够的,并指出了一条更全面、更明智地理解欧洲与种族主义纠缠的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Europe, for Example'
This paper aims to show why a philosophically informed approach to the question of Europe interrupts at least one doxa that underlies the orthodox thought of Europe as the site of a moribund worldview; namely, the construal of Europe as dominated by a political culture that is fundamentally compromised by an egregious and often implicit ‘racial theory’, ‘raciology’, or by an underlying ‘racial metaphysics’. The paper shows why this kind of matter-of-course understanding is inadequate, and points the way towards a more rounded and judicious conception of Europe’s entanglement with racism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信