印尼宪法法院的最终和有约束力的死刑判决

Amien Ru'ati, Garciano Nirahua, Ronny Soplantila
{"title":"印尼宪法法院的最终和有约束力的死刑判决","authors":"Amien Ru'ati, Garciano Nirahua, Ronny Soplantila","doi":"10.47268/pela.v1i1.5899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on the 1945 Constitution which has the constitutional authority to conduct judicial review of the 1945 Constitution whose decisions are final and binding. However, in the implementation of the judicial review of the 1945 Constitution by the Constitutional Court, many decisions of the Constitutional Court were not carried out by other State Institutions or Government Agencies which have the obligation to follow up and implement the Constitutional Court Decisions. If the decision of the Constitutional Court is not implemented in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, it can legally interfere with the administration of government as a result of not implementing the decision of the Constitutional Court as a State Institution that has attribution authority in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. \nPurposes of the Research:  To analyze the Executive Power of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court which are final and binding in Indonesia \nMethods of the Research: The type of research used in this writing is normative juridical research. \nResults of the Research: The results show that the Constitutional Court's decision has executive power because it is final and binding when pronounced by the Constitutional Court Judge, and the Constitutional Court's decision actually has a juridical position as law and is used as a source of law by the DPR and the Government in forming laws. related to the decision of the Constitutional Court","PeriodicalId":251089,"journal":{"name":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat di Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Amien Ru'ati, Garciano Nirahua, Ronny Soplantila\",\"doi\":\"10.47268/pela.v1i1.5899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on the 1945 Constitution which has the constitutional authority to conduct judicial review of the 1945 Constitution whose decisions are final and binding. However, in the implementation of the judicial review of the 1945 Constitution by the Constitutional Court, many decisions of the Constitutional Court were not carried out by other State Institutions or Government Agencies which have the obligation to follow up and implement the Constitutional Court Decisions. If the decision of the Constitutional Court is not implemented in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, it can legally interfere with the administration of government as a result of not implementing the decision of the Constitutional Court as a State Institution that has attribution authority in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. \\nPurposes of the Research:  To analyze the Executive Power of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court which are final and binding in Indonesia \\nMethods of the Research: The type of research used in this writing is normative juridical research. \\nResults of the Research: The results show that the Constitutional Court's decision has executive power because it is final and binding when pronounced by the Constitutional Court Judge, and the Constitutional Court's decision actually has a juridical position as law and is used as a source of law by the DPR and the Government in forming laws. related to the decision of the Constitutional Court\",\"PeriodicalId\":251089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PATTIMURA Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i1.5899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PATTIMURA Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i1.5899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:宪法法院是根据1945年宪法拥有司法权的国家机构,具有对1945年宪法进行司法审查的宪法权力,其决定是最终的和有约束力的。但是,在宪法法院执行对1945年《宪法》的司法审查时,宪法法院的许多决定没有得到其他国家机构或政府机构的执行,因为它们有义务跟进和执行宪法法院的裁决。如果宪法法院的决定没有在印度尼西亚共和国统一国家得到执行,它可以在法律上干涉政府的管理,因为没有执行宪法法院作为一个国家机构,在1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法中具有归属权力。研究目的:分析宪法法院判决的执行权力,这些判决在印度尼西亚是最终的和有约束力的。研究方法:本文中使用的研究类型是规范性司法研究。研究结果:研究结果表明,宪法法院的判决在由宪法法院法官宣布时具有终局性和约束力,因此具有行政权,宪法法院的判决实际上具有法律的司法地位,并被人民民主共和国和政府作为法律形成的法律渊源。与宪法法院的判决有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat di Indonesia
Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on the 1945 Constitution which has the constitutional authority to conduct judicial review of the 1945 Constitution whose decisions are final and binding. However, in the implementation of the judicial review of the 1945 Constitution by the Constitutional Court, many decisions of the Constitutional Court were not carried out by other State Institutions or Government Agencies which have the obligation to follow up and implement the Constitutional Court Decisions. If the decision of the Constitutional Court is not implemented in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, it can legally interfere with the administration of government as a result of not implementing the decision of the Constitutional Court as a State Institution that has attribution authority in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Purposes of the Research:  To analyze the Executive Power of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court which are final and binding in Indonesia Methods of the Research: The type of research used in this writing is normative juridical research. Results of the Research: The results show that the Constitutional Court's decision has executive power because it is final and binding when pronounced by the Constitutional Court Judge, and the Constitutional Court's decision actually has a juridical position as law and is used as a source of law by the DPR and the Government in forming laws. related to the decision of the Constitutional Court
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信