丁尼生的固着:精神分析与早期诗歌主题

Paul N. Zietlow, Matthew Rowlinson
{"title":"丁尼生的固着:精神分析与早期诗歌主题","authors":"Paul N. Zietlow, Matthew Rowlinson","doi":"10.2307/3201263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matthew Rowlinson proposes a revitalized and properly analytic formalism as the appropriate model for a reading of Tennyson. In a series of attentive close readings, he probes the nature of place and the structuring of desire in Tennyson's work. Focusing on the poet's most important early writings - fragments and poems produced between 1824 and 1833 - Rowlinson conflates deconstructive theory with psychoanalytic insights. The author begins by observing that the subjectivities articulated in these poems, from the strangely passive poet-seer of the \"Armageddon\" fragments to the embowered singers of \"Mariana,\" \"The Lady of Shalott,\" and \"The Hesperides\" to the absconding monarch of \"Ulysses,\" are all constituted in relation to ruined, abandoned, or inaccessible places. The placing of the subject allegorizes its relation to the signifier as well as to the discursive structures within which the signifier comes into being. On this premise, Rowlinson takes up Lacan's claim that it is through the signifier that it is through the signifier that all human desire is mediated. In the placement of the subjects he reads a distinctively Tennysonian articulation of desire. Following Paul de Man, Rowlinson demonstrates that allegory comes into being only with a structure of repetition. He has developed a formalist poetics that provides a psychoanalytic account of the most basic figurative and formal devices - allegory, metaphor, rhyme, and metre - and he offers an explication and critique of major concepts in Lacanian and Freudian psychoanalytic theory, including the gaze, the castration complex, the death drive, and the compulsion to repeat. By returning to the deconstruction, the author has resumed the challenges English studies took up in the 1970s and left incomplete in its rush to historicism. His readings offer fresh insights at the level of theory.","PeriodicalId":424324,"journal":{"name":"South Atlantic Review","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tennyson's Fixations: Psychoanalysis and the Topics of the Early Poetry\",\"authors\":\"Paul N. Zietlow, Matthew Rowlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3201263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Matthew Rowlinson proposes a revitalized and properly analytic formalism as the appropriate model for a reading of Tennyson. In a series of attentive close readings, he probes the nature of place and the structuring of desire in Tennyson's work. Focusing on the poet's most important early writings - fragments and poems produced between 1824 and 1833 - Rowlinson conflates deconstructive theory with psychoanalytic insights. The author begins by observing that the subjectivities articulated in these poems, from the strangely passive poet-seer of the \\\"Armageddon\\\" fragments to the embowered singers of \\\"Mariana,\\\" \\\"The Lady of Shalott,\\\" and \\\"The Hesperides\\\" to the absconding monarch of \\\"Ulysses,\\\" are all constituted in relation to ruined, abandoned, or inaccessible places. The placing of the subject allegorizes its relation to the signifier as well as to the discursive structures within which the signifier comes into being. On this premise, Rowlinson takes up Lacan's claim that it is through the signifier that it is through the signifier that all human desire is mediated. In the placement of the subjects he reads a distinctively Tennysonian articulation of desire. Following Paul de Man, Rowlinson demonstrates that allegory comes into being only with a structure of repetition. He has developed a formalist poetics that provides a psychoanalytic account of the most basic figurative and formal devices - allegory, metaphor, rhyme, and metre - and he offers an explication and critique of major concepts in Lacanian and Freudian psychoanalytic theory, including the gaze, the castration complex, the death drive, and the compulsion to repeat. By returning to the deconstruction, the author has resumed the challenges English studies took up in the 1970s and left incomplete in its rush to historicism. His readings offer fresh insights at the level of theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Atlantic Review\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Atlantic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3201263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Atlantic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3201263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

马修·罗林森提出了一种复兴的、恰当的分析形式主义,作为阅读丁尼生的合适模式。在一系列细心的细读中,他探索了丁尼生作品中地点的本质和欲望的结构。罗林森专注于诗人最重要的早期作品——1824年至1833年间创作的片段和诗歌——将解构主义理论与精神分析的见解混为一谈。作者首先观察到,这些诗歌中所表达的主观性,从“世界末日”片段中奇怪的被动诗人-预言家,到“玛丽安娜”,“夏洛特夫人”和“赫斯佩里德斯”中被埋没的歌手,再到“尤利西斯”中潜逃的君主,都是与被毁的、被遗弃的或难以接近的地方有关的。主体的位置寓言化了它与能指的关系,也寓言化了它与能指产生的话语结构的关系。在这个前提下,罗林森接受了拉康的主张,就是透过能指,透过能指,所有人类的欲望都被调解。在主题的位置上,他读到了一种独特的丁尼森式的欲望表达。继保罗·德曼之后,罗林森论证了寓言只有在重复的结构下才会产生。他发展了一种形式主义诗学,为最基本的形象化和形式化手段——寓言、隐喻、押韵和韵律——提供了一种精神分析的解释,并对拉康和弗洛伊德精神分析理论中的主要概念进行了解释和批判,包括凝视、阉割情结、死亡驱动和重复的冲动。通过回归解构主义,作者恢复了20世纪70年代英语研究面临的挑战,并在冲向历史主义的过程中留下了不完整的挑战。他的阅读在理论层面上提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tennyson's Fixations: Psychoanalysis and the Topics of the Early Poetry
Matthew Rowlinson proposes a revitalized and properly analytic formalism as the appropriate model for a reading of Tennyson. In a series of attentive close readings, he probes the nature of place and the structuring of desire in Tennyson's work. Focusing on the poet's most important early writings - fragments and poems produced between 1824 and 1833 - Rowlinson conflates deconstructive theory with psychoanalytic insights. The author begins by observing that the subjectivities articulated in these poems, from the strangely passive poet-seer of the "Armageddon" fragments to the embowered singers of "Mariana," "The Lady of Shalott," and "The Hesperides" to the absconding monarch of "Ulysses," are all constituted in relation to ruined, abandoned, or inaccessible places. The placing of the subject allegorizes its relation to the signifier as well as to the discursive structures within which the signifier comes into being. On this premise, Rowlinson takes up Lacan's claim that it is through the signifier that it is through the signifier that all human desire is mediated. In the placement of the subjects he reads a distinctively Tennysonian articulation of desire. Following Paul de Man, Rowlinson demonstrates that allegory comes into being only with a structure of repetition. He has developed a formalist poetics that provides a psychoanalytic account of the most basic figurative and formal devices - allegory, metaphor, rhyme, and metre - and he offers an explication and critique of major concepts in Lacanian and Freudian psychoanalytic theory, including the gaze, the castration complex, the death drive, and the compulsion to repeat. By returning to the deconstruction, the author has resumed the challenges English studies took up in the 1970s and left incomplete in its rush to historicism. His readings offer fresh insights at the level of theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信