{"title":"《超越文字的言论自由:第一修正案的惊人影响》,作者:马克·v·图什内特,艾伦·k·陈,约瑟夫·布洛彻","authors":"W. F. Richardson","doi":"10.5860/JIFP.V3I1.6562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free Speech Beyond Words: The Surprising Reach of the First Amendment addresses a straightforward, and seemingly simple, question—why is it that certain art forms that do not communicate a specific, clearly articulated message, are considered “speech” and, thus, are covered under the First Amendment? Written by three authors, this work is divided into an introduction, three main chapters, and a concluding chapter. In Chapter One, Alan Chen discusses instrumental music under the First Amendment, while in Chapter Two, Mark V. Tushnet focuses on nonrepresentational art and the First Amendment, and Joseph Blocher explores the relationship between nonsense and the First Amendment in Chapter Three (as the Supreme Court has declared nonsense poetry such as Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky” to be protected under the First Amendment.) While the authors make some headway in trying to justify First Amendment protection for these art forms (and for the concept of nonsense), their primary goal seems to be to make the argument that this is an important area of legal scholarship that has been underexplored, and to encourage further study and work in this area. ","PeriodicalId":422726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free Speech Beyond Words: The Suprising Reach of the First Amendment by Mark V. Tushnet, Alan K. Chen, and Joseph Blocher\",\"authors\":\"W. F. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/JIFP.V3I1.6562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Free Speech Beyond Words: The Surprising Reach of the First Amendment addresses a straightforward, and seemingly simple, question—why is it that certain art forms that do not communicate a specific, clearly articulated message, are considered “speech” and, thus, are covered under the First Amendment? Written by three authors, this work is divided into an introduction, three main chapters, and a concluding chapter. In Chapter One, Alan Chen discusses instrumental music under the First Amendment, while in Chapter Two, Mark V. Tushnet focuses on nonrepresentational art and the First Amendment, and Joseph Blocher explores the relationship between nonsense and the First Amendment in Chapter Three (as the Supreme Court has declared nonsense poetry such as Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky” to be protected under the First Amendment.) While the authors make some headway in trying to justify First Amendment protection for these art forms (and for the concept of nonsense), their primary goal seems to be to make the argument that this is an important area of legal scholarship that has been underexplored, and to encourage further study and work in this area. \",\"PeriodicalId\":422726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/JIFP.V3I1.6562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/JIFP.V3I1.6562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
超越文字的言论自由:《第一修正案的惊人影响》提出了一个直截了当、看似简单的问题——为什么某些不能传达特定、清晰表达的信息的艺术形式被认为是“言论”,因此受到第一修正案的保护?本书由三位作者撰写,分为导论、三章和结束语。在第一章中,Alan Chen讨论了第一修正案下的器乐,而在第二章中,Mark V. Tushnet专注于非代表性艺术和第一修正案,Joseph Blocher在第三章中探讨了废话和第一修正案之间的关系(因为最高法院已经宣布刘易斯卡罗尔的“Jabberwocky”等废话诗歌受到第一修正案的保护)。虽然作者在试图证明第一修正案对这些艺术形式的保护(以及对废话概念的保护)方面取得了一些进展,但他们的主要目标似乎是提出一个论点,即这是一个尚未得到充分探索的重要法律学术领域,并鼓励在这一领域进行进一步的研究和工作。
Free Speech Beyond Words: The Suprising Reach of the First Amendment by Mark V. Tushnet, Alan K. Chen, and Joseph Blocher
Free Speech Beyond Words: The Surprising Reach of the First Amendment addresses a straightforward, and seemingly simple, question—why is it that certain art forms that do not communicate a specific, clearly articulated message, are considered “speech” and, thus, are covered under the First Amendment? Written by three authors, this work is divided into an introduction, three main chapters, and a concluding chapter. In Chapter One, Alan Chen discusses instrumental music under the First Amendment, while in Chapter Two, Mark V. Tushnet focuses on nonrepresentational art and the First Amendment, and Joseph Blocher explores the relationship between nonsense and the First Amendment in Chapter Three (as the Supreme Court has declared nonsense poetry such as Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky” to be protected under the First Amendment.) While the authors make some headway in trying to justify First Amendment protection for these art forms (and for the concept of nonsense), their primary goal seems to be to make the argument that this is an important area of legal scholarship that has been underexplored, and to encourage further study and work in this area.