采用CMOS和混合CMOS/忆阻门的数字设计:比较研究

N. Ibrahim, S. Salah, M. Safar, M. El-Kharashi
{"title":"采用CMOS和混合CMOS/忆阻门的数字设计:比较研究","authors":"N. Ibrahim, S. Salah, M. Safar, M. El-Kharashi","doi":"10.1109/ICCES.2018.8639192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memristor is a passive element with two terminals, where the magnetic flux is related to the amount of the electric charge passed through the device. Memristive technologies are valuable as they are scalable, non-volatile and compatible with CMOS. In this paper, AND, OR and XOR logic gates which are the seed of any digital design are simulated using memristor, the used memristor model is Voltage ThrEshold Adaptive Memristor (VTEAM), to compare between memristor-based designs and the known CMOS-based logic gates knowing that CMOS technology used is TSMC 65 nm. A few parameters such as propagation delay, power consumption, number of devices used in each circuit have been calculated and studied in both approaches. The proposed logic shows lower power consumption and better area utilization compared to 65 nm CMOS logic circuits operating at standard 1.2 V. Our simulations were run using Cadence Virtuoso IC6.1.4 simulator.","PeriodicalId":113848,"journal":{"name":"2018 13th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","volume":"373 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Design using CMOS and Hybrid CMOS/Memristor Gates: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Ibrahim, S. Salah, M. Safar, M. El-Kharashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCES.2018.8639192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Memristor is a passive element with two terminals, where the magnetic flux is related to the amount of the electric charge passed through the device. Memristive technologies are valuable as they are scalable, non-volatile and compatible with CMOS. In this paper, AND, OR and XOR logic gates which are the seed of any digital design are simulated using memristor, the used memristor model is Voltage ThrEshold Adaptive Memristor (VTEAM), to compare between memristor-based designs and the known CMOS-based logic gates knowing that CMOS technology used is TSMC 65 nm. A few parameters such as propagation delay, power consumption, number of devices used in each circuit have been calculated and studied in both approaches. The proposed logic shows lower power consumption and better area utilization compared to 65 nm CMOS logic circuits operating at standard 1.2 V. Our simulations were run using Cadence Virtuoso IC6.1.4 simulator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 13th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)\",\"volume\":\"373 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 13th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2018.8639192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 13th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2018.8639192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

忆阻器是一种有两个终端的无源元件,其中磁通与通过器件的电荷量有关。忆阻技术是有价值的,因为它们是可扩展的,非易失性和兼容CMOS。本文利用忆阻器对作为数字设计种子的与、或和异或逻辑门进行了仿真,所使用的忆阻器模型为电压阈值自适应忆阻器(VTEAM),并将基于忆阻器的设计与已知的基于CMOS的逻辑门进行了比较,所使用的CMOS技术为台积电65nm。在这两种方法中都计算和研究了一些参数,如传播延迟、功耗、每个电路中使用的器件数量。与在标准1.2 V下工作的65 nm CMOS逻辑电路相比,所提出的逻辑电路具有更低的功耗和更好的面积利用率。我们的模拟是使用Cadence Virtuoso IC6.1.4模拟器运行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Design using CMOS and Hybrid CMOS/Memristor Gates: A Comparative Study
Memristor is a passive element with two terminals, where the magnetic flux is related to the amount of the electric charge passed through the device. Memristive technologies are valuable as they are scalable, non-volatile and compatible with CMOS. In this paper, AND, OR and XOR logic gates which are the seed of any digital design are simulated using memristor, the used memristor model is Voltage ThrEshold Adaptive Memristor (VTEAM), to compare between memristor-based designs and the known CMOS-based logic gates knowing that CMOS technology used is TSMC 65 nm. A few parameters such as propagation delay, power consumption, number of devices used in each circuit have been calculated and studied in both approaches. The proposed logic shows lower power consumption and better area utilization compared to 65 nm CMOS logic circuits operating at standard 1.2 V. Our simulations were run using Cadence Virtuoso IC6.1.4 simulator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信