{"title":"具有视界和不对称偏好的心理账户","authors":"G. Hübner, Thomas Lejeune","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2893697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper extends the mental accounting framework in behavioral finance with investors' time horizon and with asymmetric consideration between extreme gains and losses. This generalized Horizon-Asymmetry Mental Accounting framework (HAMA) has important implications for the determination of investors' risk preferences. Risk aversion and the bond-to-stock ratio are found to decline with investment horizon. Investors who assign a high value to upside potential tend to select portfolios with more important asymmetric and leptokurtic distributions. In its general version, the model does not rely on any specific utility function nor any functional shape for the return distribution. The model is shown to be flexible enough to encompass optimal allocations from the mean-variance portfolio theory, the expected power utility criterion, and a non-Gaussian utility framework.","PeriodicalId":358237,"journal":{"name":"Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Accounts with Horizon and Asymmetry Preferences\",\"authors\":\"G. Hübner, Thomas Lejeune\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2893697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper extends the mental accounting framework in behavioral finance with investors' time horizon and with asymmetric consideration between extreme gains and losses. This generalized Horizon-Asymmetry Mental Accounting framework (HAMA) has important implications for the determination of investors' risk preferences. Risk aversion and the bond-to-stock ratio are found to decline with investment horizon. Investors who assign a high value to upside potential tend to select portfolios with more important asymmetric and leptokurtic distributions. In its general version, the model does not rely on any specific utility function nor any functional shape for the return distribution. The model is shown to be flexible enough to encompass optimal allocations from the mean-variance portfolio theory, the expected power utility criterion, and a non-Gaussian utility framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mental Accounts with Horizon and Asymmetry Preferences
The paper extends the mental accounting framework in behavioral finance with investors' time horizon and with asymmetric consideration between extreme gains and losses. This generalized Horizon-Asymmetry Mental Accounting framework (HAMA) has important implications for the determination of investors' risk preferences. Risk aversion and the bond-to-stock ratio are found to decline with investment horizon. Investors who assign a high value to upside potential tend to select portfolios with more important asymmetric and leptokurtic distributions. In its general version, the model does not rely on any specific utility function nor any functional shape for the return distribution. The model is shown to be flexible enough to encompass optimal allocations from the mean-variance portfolio theory, the expected power utility criterion, and a non-Gaussian utility framework.