亲子暴力与亲子暴力:一项元分析回顾

Raquel Gallego, M. Novo, Francisca Fariña, R. Arce
{"title":"亲子暴力与亲子暴力:一项元分析回顾","authors":"Raquel Gallego, M. Novo, Francisca Fariña, R. Arce","doi":"10.5093/EJPALC2019A4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to examine the literature on the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence, a meta-analytic review was designed with 26 effect sizes assessing the relationship between child-to-parent and parent-to-child violence in 19 primary studies. Correlational effect sizes were computed and corrected for sampling error, and predictor and criterion unreliability. The results showed a significantly positive, medium magnitude (ρ = .36) mean true effect size for the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence. Similar results were found for direct and vicarious victimization. The probability of developing child-to-parent violence for children victimized by parents increased 71% as compared to non-victimized children. The child-to parent violence type (physical or psychological), and the population (judicial or community) were analysed as moderators. The results revealed similar effects in both types of child-to-parent violence and in both populations: a significantly positive, medium in magnitude mean true effect size. The theoretical and practical implications for measuring child-to parent violence are discussed.","PeriodicalId":344860,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Child-to-parent Violence and Parent-to-child Violence: A Meta-analytic Review\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Gallego, M. Novo, Francisca Fariña, R. Arce\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/EJPALC2019A4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to examine the literature on the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence, a meta-analytic review was designed with 26 effect sizes assessing the relationship between child-to-parent and parent-to-child violence in 19 primary studies. Correlational effect sizes were computed and corrected for sampling error, and predictor and criterion unreliability. The results showed a significantly positive, medium magnitude (ρ = .36) mean true effect size for the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence. Similar results were found for direct and vicarious victimization. The probability of developing child-to-parent violence for children victimized by parents increased 71% as compared to non-victimized children. The child-to parent violence type (physical or psychological), and the population (judicial or community) were analysed as moderators. The results revealed similar effects in both types of child-to-parent violence and in both populations: a significantly positive, medium in magnitude mean true effect size. The theoretical and practical implications for measuring child-to parent violence are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"93\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/EJPALC2019A4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/EJPALC2019A4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

摘要

为了检验关于亲子暴力和亲子暴力之间关系的文献,我们设计了一项meta分析综述,用26个效应量来评估19项主要研究中亲子暴力和亲子暴力之间的关系。计算相关效应大小并校正抽样误差、预测器和判据的不可靠性。结果显示,儿童对父母暴力和父母对儿童暴力之间关系的平均真实效应值为显著正的中等大小(ρ = 0.36)。在直接和间接伤害中也发现了类似的结果。与未受害的儿童相比,遭受父母伤害的儿童发生孩子对父母暴力的可能性增加了71%。儿童对父母的暴力类型(身体或心理)和人口(司法或社区)作为调节因素进行了分析。结果显示,在两种类型的亲子暴力和两种人群中都有类似的影响:显著的正效应,中等大小的平均真实效应大小。讨论了测量儿童对父母暴力的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Child-to-parent Violence and Parent-to-child Violence: A Meta-analytic Review
In order to examine the literature on the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence, a meta-analytic review was designed with 26 effect sizes assessing the relationship between child-to-parent and parent-to-child violence in 19 primary studies. Correlational effect sizes were computed and corrected for sampling error, and predictor and criterion unreliability. The results showed a significantly positive, medium magnitude (ρ = .36) mean true effect size for the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence. Similar results were found for direct and vicarious victimization. The probability of developing child-to-parent violence for children victimized by parents increased 71% as compared to non-victimized children. The child-to parent violence type (physical or psychological), and the population (judicial or community) were analysed as moderators. The results revealed similar effects in both types of child-to-parent violence and in both populations: a significantly positive, medium in magnitude mean true effect size. The theoretical and practical implications for measuring child-to parent violence are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信