头外位

G. Guirguis, Andrew Haddad, Shauna F. Williams
{"title":"头外位","authors":"G. Guirguis, Andrew Haddad, Shauna F. Williams","doi":"10.1097/01.PGO.0000484628.84133.e0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breech presentation occurs in 3% to 4% of all singleton pregnancies at term.1 Historically, management options for the term breech patient have been breech vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) and cesarean delivery. Since publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000,2 there has been a shift away from vaginal breech delivery and an increase in rates of cesarean delivery.3 Since then, long-term outcomes after 2-year follow-up from that cohort did not show a difference in death or neurodevelopmental delay,4 but other cohorts have shown an increase in neonatal death or morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery.5 Vaginal breech can be offered in selected cases, but because of limited training and experience, cesarean delivery rates will likely continue to be the predominant mode of delivery for this group of patients. Alternatively, ECV should be considered as patients approach term to decrease the rate of cesarean delivery. Incorporating ECV into routine practice may produce a decrease in morbidity and also has the potential to decrease health care costs.6 Success rates for the procedure range from 30% to 86%, with an average success rate of 58%.7 Despite the likely benefits afforded by ECV, the procedure is not routinely considered, thus resulting in a gap between present and ideal practice. Given the potential value and the wide range of success rates as described, a thorough understanding of patient selection and ECV techniques would be helpful to practicing obstetrician/gynecologists. The goal of this article is to provide a review of ECV to improve vaginal delivery rates and help guide the clinician in counseling patients about version.","PeriodicalId":193089,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Cephalic Version\",\"authors\":\"G. Guirguis, Andrew Haddad, Shauna F. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.PGO.0000484628.84133.e0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Breech presentation occurs in 3% to 4% of all singleton pregnancies at term.1 Historically, management options for the term breech patient have been breech vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) and cesarean delivery. Since publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000,2 there has been a shift away from vaginal breech delivery and an increase in rates of cesarean delivery.3 Since then, long-term outcomes after 2-year follow-up from that cohort did not show a difference in death or neurodevelopmental delay,4 but other cohorts have shown an increase in neonatal death or morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery.5 Vaginal breech can be offered in selected cases, but because of limited training and experience, cesarean delivery rates will likely continue to be the predominant mode of delivery for this group of patients. Alternatively, ECV should be considered as patients approach term to decrease the rate of cesarean delivery. Incorporating ECV into routine practice may produce a decrease in morbidity and also has the potential to decrease health care costs.6 Success rates for the procedure range from 30% to 86%, with an average success rate of 58%.7 Despite the likely benefits afforded by ECV, the procedure is not routinely considered, thus resulting in a gap between present and ideal practice. Given the potential value and the wide range of success rates as described, a thorough understanding of patient selection and ECV techniques would be helpful to practicing obstetrician/gynecologists. The goal of this article is to provide a review of ECV to improve vaginal delivery rates and help guide the clinician in counseling patients about version.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"206 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PGO.0000484628.84133.e0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PGO.0000484628.84133.e0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

足月单胎妊娠出现臀位的比例为3%至4%从历史上看,对足月臀位患者的治疗选择是阴道阴道分娩,体外头位分娩(ECV)和剖宫产。自从2000年《臀位试验》发表以来,阴道臀位分娩的趋势有所减少,剖宫产的比例有所增加从那时起,该队列2年随访后的长期结果未显示死亡或神经发育迟缓的差异4,但其他队列显示与阴道臀位分娩相关的新生儿死亡或发病率增加5在某些情况下,可以提供阴道分娩,但由于培训和经验有限,剖宫产率可能仍然是这类患者的主要分娩方式。另外,当患者接近足月时,应考虑ECV,以降低剖宫产率。将体外循环纳入常规实践可能会降低发病率,也有可能降低医疗保健成本手术成功率从30%到86%不等,平均成功率为58%尽管ECV可能带来好处,但通常不考虑该程序,从而导致目前与理想实践之间的差距。鉴于潜在的价值和广泛的成功率,深入了解患者选择和ECV技术将有助于实践产科医生/妇科医生。本文的目的是提供一个回顾ECV,以提高阴道分娩率,并帮助指导临床医生咨询患者的版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Cephalic Version
Breech presentation occurs in 3% to 4% of all singleton pregnancies at term.1 Historically, management options for the term breech patient have been breech vaginal delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) and cesarean delivery. Since publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000,2 there has been a shift away from vaginal breech delivery and an increase in rates of cesarean delivery.3 Since then, long-term outcomes after 2-year follow-up from that cohort did not show a difference in death or neurodevelopmental delay,4 but other cohorts have shown an increase in neonatal death or morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery.5 Vaginal breech can be offered in selected cases, but because of limited training and experience, cesarean delivery rates will likely continue to be the predominant mode of delivery for this group of patients. Alternatively, ECV should be considered as patients approach term to decrease the rate of cesarean delivery. Incorporating ECV into routine practice may produce a decrease in morbidity and also has the potential to decrease health care costs.6 Success rates for the procedure range from 30% to 86%, with an average success rate of 58%.7 Despite the likely benefits afforded by ECV, the procedure is not routinely considered, thus resulting in a gap between present and ideal practice. Given the potential value and the wide range of success rates as described, a thorough understanding of patient selection and ECV techniques would be helpful to practicing obstetrician/gynecologists. The goal of this article is to provide a review of ECV to improve vaginal delivery rates and help guide the clinician in counseling patients about version.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信