软件工程中法规遵从性的观点

Evelyn Kempe, Aaron K. Massey
{"title":"软件工程中法规遵从性的观点","authors":"Evelyn Kempe, Aaron K. Massey","doi":"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compliance reviews within a software organization are internal attempts to verify regulatory and security requirements during product development before its release. However, these reviews are not enough to adequately assess and address regulatory and security requirements throughout a software's development lifecycle. We believe requirements engineers can benefit from an improved understanding of how software practitioners treat and perceive compliance requirements. This paper describes an interview study seeking to understand how regulatory and security standard requirements are addressed, how burdensome they may be for businesses, and how our participants perceived them in the software development lifecycle. We interviewed 15 software practitioners from 13 organizations with different roles in the software development process and working in various industry domains, including big tech, healthcare, data analysis, finance, and small businesses. Our findings suggest that, for our participants, the software release process is the ultimate focus for regulatory and security compliance reviews. Also, most participants suggested that having a defined process for addressing compliance requirements was freeing rather than burdensome. Finally, participants generally saw compliance requirements as an investment for both employees and customers. These findings may be unintuitive, and we discuss seven lessons this work may hold for requirements engineering.","PeriodicalId":440285,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on Regulatory Compliance in Software Engineering\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn Kempe, Aaron K. Massey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compliance reviews within a software organization are internal attempts to verify regulatory and security requirements during product development before its release. However, these reviews are not enough to adequately assess and address regulatory and security requirements throughout a software's development lifecycle. We believe requirements engineers can benefit from an improved understanding of how software practitioners treat and perceive compliance requirements. This paper describes an interview study seeking to understand how regulatory and security standard requirements are addressed, how burdensome they may be for businesses, and how our participants perceived them in the software development lifecycle. We interviewed 15 software practitioners from 13 organizations with different roles in the software development process and working in various industry domains, including big tech, healthcare, data analysis, finance, and small businesses. Our findings suggest that, for our participants, the software release process is the ultimate focus for regulatory and security compliance reviews. Also, most participants suggested that having a defined process for addressing compliance requirements was freeing rather than burdensome. Finally, participants generally saw compliance requirements as an investment for both employees and customers. These findings may be unintuitive, and we discuss seven lessons this work may hold for requirements engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

软件组织中的遵从性审查是在产品发布之前,在产品开发期间验证法规和安全需求的内部尝试。然而,这些审查不足以充分评估和处理整个软件开发生命周期中的法规和安全需求。我们相信需求工程师可以从对软件从业者如何对待和感知遵从性需求的改进理解中获益。本文描述了一项访谈研究,旨在了解法规和安全标准需求是如何处理的,它们对企业来说可能是多么繁重,以及我们的参与者在软件开发生命周期中是如何感知它们的。我们采访了来自13个组织的15名软件从业者,他们在软件开发过程中扮演着不同的角色,并在不同的行业领域工作,包括大型科技、医疗保健、数据分析、金融和小型企业。我们的发现表明,对于我们的参与者来说,软件发布过程是法规和安全遵从性审查的最终焦点。此外,大多数与会者建议,有一个明确的过程来处理遵从性需求是自由的,而不是负担。最后,参与者通常将遵从性需求视为对员工和客户的投资。这些发现可能不是直观的,我们讨论了这项工作可能为需求工程提供的七个经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives on Regulatory Compliance in Software Engineering
Compliance reviews within a software organization are internal attempts to verify regulatory and security requirements during product development before its release. However, these reviews are not enough to adequately assess and address regulatory and security requirements throughout a software's development lifecycle. We believe requirements engineers can benefit from an improved understanding of how software practitioners treat and perceive compliance requirements. This paper describes an interview study seeking to understand how regulatory and security standard requirements are addressed, how burdensome they may be for businesses, and how our participants perceived them in the software development lifecycle. We interviewed 15 software practitioners from 13 organizations with different roles in the software development process and working in various industry domains, including big tech, healthcare, data analysis, finance, and small businesses. Our findings suggest that, for our participants, the software release process is the ultimate focus for regulatory and security compliance reviews. Also, most participants suggested that having a defined process for addressing compliance requirements was freeing rather than burdensome. Finally, participants generally saw compliance requirements as an investment for both employees and customers. These findings may be unintuitive, and we discuss seven lessons this work may hold for requirements engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信