Hans Harryson
{"title":"Den pædagogiske diskurs i læreruddannelsen - formål, indhold og undervisningsmetoder","authors":"Hans Harryson","doi":"10.7146/aul.282.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"”The pedagogical discourse in teacher education – purpose, content and teaching methods.          A comparative study of the teacher education in HSN, Drammen, VIA, Aarhus and HI, Reykjavik”This thesis explores the purpose of pedagogical courses (i.e. pedagogy and related fields) in teacher education degrees in the 2010s and how these courses contribute to develop both teacher competences and teaching competences.The thesis is a comparative analysis of three Nordic teacher education degrees, namelyThe teacher education degree at HSN, Drammen (NO)The teacher education degree at VIA, Aarhus (DK)The teacher education degree at HI, Reykjavik (IS)To gain an understanding of the role of the pedagogical courses at the three teacher education degrees, I have employedDocument analysisSemi-structured interviewsThe document analysis has covered both governmental documents (e.g. laws and executive orders) and institutional documents (e.g. curricula).The persons interviewed represent Educators of courses in pedagogyFinal year studentsGraduatesThough using two different research methods, I have employed cross-sectional data indexing. This means I have used the same set of indexing categories for both the document analysis and the interview analysis.In processing the data, I have used etic coding (or predetermined coding). The categories I have operated with in organising the data areTitles and size (in ECTS) of pedagogical coursesLearning outcomesThematic and theoretical contentTeaching methodsMethods of examinationPractical applicationPositioning – differences between pedagogical courses on one side and teaching subjects on the otherIn the thesis, pedagogical courses are seen as a unique discourse in teacher education degrees, in which the teaching profession is expressed in certain ways, and where attempts are made to prepare students in teacher education for their profession in different ways than in teaching subject courses and in practicums.In analysing the data, I use discourse analytic (DA) reading strategies. The reason for using DA is my interest in how policy makers on different levels, educators, students and graduates understand and articulate the pedagogical discipline’s role and unique challenges in teacher education degrees today.Among the central findings of my research are: (1)   The pedagogical discourse is a relatively isolated discourse in teacher education. (2)   The pedagogical discourse has expanded over the past decades and covers today areas that previously belonged to the teaching subjects, the academic field, information technology etc. (3)   Although the pedagogical discourse has expanded and has expanded in different directions in the various countries, a marked ‘typicality’ can be traced across national borders. The pedagogical discourse typically discusses cross-disciplinary themes, includingthe purpose and curricula of public schoolsdemocracylearning and teaching theoriesteaching methods and differentiationevaluationclassroom managementthe importance of relationshipsschool/home cooperationinclusionchallenges in special educationteacher cognition broadly understood (4)   The pedagogical disciplines are the most theoretical in teacher education. Consequentially, the theory-practice challenges are at least as great in pedagogical courses as they are in other disciplines in teacher education—if not greater. (5)   Even though modern teacher education programmes work with ‘learning outcomes’ and not ‘teaching input,’ the pedagogical discourse still relies on its own unique theories. These theories are neither derived from the teaching subject or practice field but from the pedagogical field’s traditional source theories – psychology, sociology and philosophy.(6)   In the pedagogical discourse, students read many introductory textbooks written for the teaching profession, teacher education or specific courses in teacher education. (7)   In the pedagogical discourse, students read a limited amount of primary literature and research literature. Public school textbooks are so to say absent in the bibliographies. (8)   In the pedagogical discourse, lectures using PowerPoint is the most used teaching method. There is little to suggest that teaching in pedagogical courses is more exemplary and varied than in other courses. (9)   Both daily teaching and exams set markedly greater focus on knowledge goals than skill and competence goals.Educators, students and graduates all agree that the pedagogical field is an important part in qualifying one to teach. But they simultaneously point out that in the pedagogical discourse students learn primarily ´to know, think and feel as teachers` and to a far lesser extent ´to act as teachers` i.e. it is the student’s mind set which is the discourse’s primary focus area and not the students’ competence to perform in a future classroom","PeriodicalId":126978,"journal":{"name":"AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.282.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师教育中的教学话语——目的、内容和教学方法。HSN, Drammen, VIA, Aarhus和HI, Reykjavik的教师教育比较研究本论文探讨了2010年代教师教育学位中教育学课程(即教育学及相关领域)的目的,以及这些课程如何促进教师能力和教学能力的发展。本文对北欧三个教师教育学位进行了比较分析,分别是:北欧北欧大学的教师教育学位、北欧北欧大学的教师教育学位、北欧北欧北欧国家奥胡斯大学的教师教育学位、北欧北欧国家雷克雅未克大学的教师教育学位,以了解北欧三个教师教育学位中教育学课程的作用。文件分析半结构化面试文件分析既包括政府文件(如法律和行政命令),也包括机构文件(如课程)。受访者代表了教育学课程的教育者、大四学生和毕业生。虽然使用了两种不同的研究方法,但我采用了横断面数据索引。这意味着我对文档分析和访谈分析使用了相同的索引分类集。在处理数据时,我使用了etic编码(或预定编码)。我在组织数据时使用的类别是:教学课程的标题和规模(以ECTS为单位)、学习成果、主题和理论内容、教学方法、考试方法、实际应用、定位——教学课程与教学科目之间的差异。在本文中,教学课程被视为教师教育学位的一个独特话语,在这个话语中,教学专业以某种方式表达。他们试图用不同的方式让学生在教师教育中为他们的职业做好准备,而不是在教授学科课程和实习中。在分析数据时,我使用了语篇分析(DA)阅读策略。使用数据分析的原因是我对不同层次的政策制定者、教育工作者、学生和毕业生如何理解和阐明教学学科在当今教师教育学位中的作用和独特挑战感兴趣。本研究的主要发现有:(1)教师教育中的教学话语是一个相对孤立的话语。(2)在过去的几十年里,教学话语已经扩展,涵盖了今天以前属于教学学科、学术领域、信息技术等领域。(3)尽管教学话语在各个国家已经扩展,并向不同的方向扩展,但一个明显的“典型性”可以跨越国界。教学话语通常讨论跨学科的主题,包括公立学校的目的和课程、民主、学习和教学理论、教学方法和差异化、评估、课堂管理、关系的重要性、学校/家庭合作、包容、特殊教育中的挑战、广泛理解的教师认知(4)在教师教育中,教学学科是最理论化的。因此,在教学课程中,理论与实践的挑战至少和在教师教育的其他学科中一样大——如果不是更大的话。(5)尽管现代教师教育项目以“学习成果”而不是“教学投入”为基础,但教学话语仍然依赖于自己独特的理论。这些理论既不是来自教学学科,也不是来自实践领域,而是来自教学领域的传统渊源理论——心理学、社会学和哲学。(6)在教学话语中,学生阅读了许多为教师职业、教师教育或教师教育的特定课程编写的入门教科书。(7)在教学话语中,学生阅读的主要文献和研究文献数量有限。公立学校的教科书在参考书目中可以说是缺席的。(8)在教学话语中,使用ppt讲课是使用最多的教学方法。几乎没有证据表明教育学课程的教学比其他课程更具示范性和多样性。(9)日常教学和考试都更注重知识目标,而不是技能和能力目标。教育工作者、学生和毕业生都同意,教学领域是一个人能否胜任教学工作的重要组成部分。但他们同时指出,在教学话语中,学生主要学习“像教师一样认识、思考和感受”,而在更小的程度上学习“像教师一样行动”,也就是说,话语主要关注的是学生的思维模式,而不是学生在未来课堂上的表现能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Den pædagogiske diskurs i læreruddannelsen - formål, indhold og undervisningsmetoder
”The pedagogical discourse in teacher education – purpose, content and teaching methods.          A comparative study of the teacher education in HSN, Drammen, VIA, Aarhus and HI, Reykjavik”This thesis explores the purpose of pedagogical courses (i.e. pedagogy and related fields) in teacher education degrees in the 2010s and how these courses contribute to develop both teacher competences and teaching competences.The thesis is a comparative analysis of three Nordic teacher education degrees, namelyThe teacher education degree at HSN, Drammen (NO)The teacher education degree at VIA, Aarhus (DK)The teacher education degree at HI, Reykjavik (IS)To gain an understanding of the role of the pedagogical courses at the three teacher education degrees, I have employedDocument analysisSemi-structured interviewsThe document analysis has covered both governmental documents (e.g. laws and executive orders) and institutional documents (e.g. curricula).The persons interviewed represent Educators of courses in pedagogyFinal year studentsGraduatesThough using two different research methods, I have employed cross-sectional data indexing. This means I have used the same set of indexing categories for both the document analysis and the interview analysis.In processing the data, I have used etic coding (or predetermined coding). The categories I have operated with in organising the data areTitles and size (in ECTS) of pedagogical coursesLearning outcomesThematic and theoretical contentTeaching methodsMethods of examinationPractical applicationPositioning – differences between pedagogical courses on one side and teaching subjects on the otherIn the thesis, pedagogical courses are seen as a unique discourse in teacher education degrees, in which the teaching profession is expressed in certain ways, and where attempts are made to prepare students in teacher education for their profession in different ways than in teaching subject courses and in practicums.In analysing the data, I use discourse analytic (DA) reading strategies. The reason for using DA is my interest in how policy makers on different levels, educators, students and graduates understand and articulate the pedagogical discipline’s role and unique challenges in teacher education degrees today.Among the central findings of my research are: (1)   The pedagogical discourse is a relatively isolated discourse in teacher education. (2)   The pedagogical discourse has expanded over the past decades and covers today areas that previously belonged to the teaching subjects, the academic field, information technology etc. (3)   Although the pedagogical discourse has expanded and has expanded in different directions in the various countries, a marked ‘typicality’ can be traced across national borders. The pedagogical discourse typically discusses cross-disciplinary themes, includingthe purpose and curricula of public schoolsdemocracylearning and teaching theoriesteaching methods and differentiationevaluationclassroom managementthe importance of relationshipsschool/home cooperationinclusionchallenges in special educationteacher cognition broadly understood (4)   The pedagogical disciplines are the most theoretical in teacher education. Consequentially, the theory-practice challenges are at least as great in pedagogical courses as they are in other disciplines in teacher education—if not greater. (5)   Even though modern teacher education programmes work with ‘learning outcomes’ and not ‘teaching input,’ the pedagogical discourse still relies on its own unique theories. These theories are neither derived from the teaching subject or practice field but from the pedagogical field’s traditional source theories – psychology, sociology and philosophy.(6)   In the pedagogical discourse, students read many introductory textbooks written for the teaching profession, teacher education or specific courses in teacher education. (7)   In the pedagogical discourse, students read a limited amount of primary literature and research literature. Public school textbooks are so to say absent in the bibliographies. (8)   In the pedagogical discourse, lectures using PowerPoint is the most used teaching method. There is little to suggest that teaching in pedagogical courses is more exemplary and varied than in other courses. (9)   Both daily teaching and exams set markedly greater focus on knowledge goals than skill and competence goals.Educators, students and graduates all agree that the pedagogical field is an important part in qualifying one to teach. But they simultaneously point out that in the pedagogical discourse students learn primarily ´to know, think and feel as teachers` and to a far lesser extent ´to act as teachers` i.e. it is the student’s mind set which is the discourse’s primary focus area and not the students’ competence to perform in a future classroom
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信