早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较研究

V. Mudhale, P. Phatak, S. Dige, U. Ghate, B. Kadalge
{"title":"早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较研究","authors":"V. Mudhale, P. Phatak, S. Dige, U. Ghate, B. Kadalge","doi":"10.4038/sljs.v41i2.9030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction- Inflammation of the gall bladder is known as acute cholecystitis. Sudden pain in the upper right of the abdomen along with bloating, vomiting, fever, tenderness are symptoms of acute cholecystitis. Laproscopic cholecystectomy is considered to be the gold standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. \nObjective- To compare operative and post-operative outcomes like operating time, injury to bile ducts, postoperative pain, total length of hospital stay, need for conversion to open cholecystectomy between immediate and late LC. \nMethodology- Sixty-eight patients aged between 18 to 60 years having acute cholecystitis admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Patients were categorized and analyzed based on length of time from presentation to surgery. We defined operation of cholecystectomy within 3 days of presentation as ‘early’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy and anywhere after 3 days as ‘delayed’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy. \nResults: The p value obtained for ROFA is 0.042. and that for Pain scale is 0.027. Since the p value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected and we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups with respect to these factors. \nConclusion- Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis but return to full activity is early and pain scale is less in cases of early cholecystectomy. \n","PeriodicalId":227431,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A domparative study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis\",\"authors\":\"V. Mudhale, P. Phatak, S. Dige, U. Ghate, B. Kadalge\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljs.v41i2.9030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction- Inflammation of the gall bladder is known as acute cholecystitis. Sudden pain in the upper right of the abdomen along with bloating, vomiting, fever, tenderness are symptoms of acute cholecystitis. Laproscopic cholecystectomy is considered to be the gold standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. \\nObjective- To compare operative and post-operative outcomes like operating time, injury to bile ducts, postoperative pain, total length of hospital stay, need for conversion to open cholecystectomy between immediate and late LC. \\nMethodology- Sixty-eight patients aged between 18 to 60 years having acute cholecystitis admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Patients were categorized and analyzed based on length of time from presentation to surgery. We defined operation of cholecystectomy within 3 days of presentation as ‘early’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy and anywhere after 3 days as ‘delayed’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy. \\nResults: The p value obtained for ROFA is 0.042. and that for Pain scale is 0.027. Since the p value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected and we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups with respect to these factors. \\nConclusion- Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis but return to full activity is early and pain scale is less in cases of early cholecystectomy. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":227431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljs.v41i2.9030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljs.v41i2.9030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胆囊炎症被称为急性胆囊炎。右上腹部突然疼痛并伴有腹胀、呕吐、发热、压痛是急性胆囊炎的症状。腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是治疗急性胆囊炎的金标准。目的:比较即刻胆囊切除术和晚期胆囊切除术的手术和术后结果,如手术时间、胆管损伤、术后疼痛、总住院时间、转开腹胆囊切除术的需要。方法:68例年龄在18至60岁之间的急性胆囊炎患者接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术。根据从出现到手术的时间长度对患者进行分类和分析。我们将就诊后3天内的胆囊切除术定义为“早期”腹腔镜胆囊切除术,3天后的任何地方定义为“延迟”腹腔镜胆囊切除术。结果:ROFA的p值为0.042。疼痛量表为0.027。由于p值小于0.05,因此拒绝原假设,我们可以得出结论,两组的均值在这些因素方面存在统计学显著差异。结论-早期和延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术都是治疗急性胆囊炎的可能和安全的方法,但早期胆囊切除术患者恢复完全活动的时间较早,疼痛程度较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A domparative study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Introduction- Inflammation of the gall bladder is known as acute cholecystitis. Sudden pain in the upper right of the abdomen along with bloating, vomiting, fever, tenderness are symptoms of acute cholecystitis. Laproscopic cholecystectomy is considered to be the gold standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Objective- To compare operative and post-operative outcomes like operating time, injury to bile ducts, postoperative pain, total length of hospital stay, need for conversion to open cholecystectomy between immediate and late LC. Methodology- Sixty-eight patients aged between 18 to 60 years having acute cholecystitis admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. Patients were categorized and analyzed based on length of time from presentation to surgery. We defined operation of cholecystectomy within 3 days of presentation as ‘early’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy and anywhere after 3 days as ‘delayed’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: The p value obtained for ROFA is 0.042. and that for Pain scale is 0.027. Since the p value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected and we can conclude that there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups with respect to these factors. Conclusion- Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis but return to full activity is early and pain scale is less in cases of early cholecystectomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信