掠夺性出版与国际生产力的必要性:喂养和喂养主导

S. Rijcke, Tereza Stöckelová
{"title":"掠夺性出版与国际生产力的必要性:喂养和喂养主导","authors":"S. Rijcke, Tereza Stöckelová","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European research policy and research evaluation. The imports of “internationalization” manifest prominently in how particular value is attached to “international visibility,” “international impact,” or the international character of publication venues. The international is used as a trope on a number of levels: in EU funding schemes, in project goals that guide national assessment exercises, in output measurements, in the formulation of institutional research missions, and in tenuretrack criteria. Especially in smaller countries, such as the Netherlands and the Czech Republic, the international is often taken as an unquestioned proxy for quality, proving recognition of value and impact beyond the “academic pods.” Consequently, the international, the national, and the local constitute a clear normative hierarchy. For example, it is taken for granted that international excellence encompasses national excellence and (as such) is supposedly more valuable. Inspired by Lin and Law’s discussion of “modes of international” (2013, 2014), we argue in this chapter that gaming metrics, predatory publishing, and exploiting the model of gold open access (Beall, 2012) can be partly understood as a logical response to the imperative of internationalization going wild. It enacts a different, yet dubious, alternative mode of internationalization for those researchers and institutions who fail— for better or worse— within the established mode of international, with its epistemic and economic centers in the global, Anglophone North/West. In this chapter, we zoom in on a recent misconduct case in the Czech Republic to show how the imperative of internationalization and productivity inscribed in the country’s research assessment framework impinges on institutional and individual publication strategies and produces a market for gaming in the academy. 7 Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding Off and Feeding Up the Dominant","PeriodicalId":186262,"journal":{"name":"Gaming the Metrics","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding Off and Feeding Up the Dominant\",\"authors\":\"S. Rijcke, Tereza Stöckelová\",\"doi\":\"10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"European research policy and research evaluation. The imports of “internationalization” manifest prominently in how particular value is attached to “international visibility,” “international impact,” or the international character of publication venues. The international is used as a trope on a number of levels: in EU funding schemes, in project goals that guide national assessment exercises, in output measurements, in the formulation of institutional research missions, and in tenuretrack criteria. Especially in smaller countries, such as the Netherlands and the Czech Republic, the international is often taken as an unquestioned proxy for quality, proving recognition of value and impact beyond the “academic pods.” Consequently, the international, the national, and the local constitute a clear normative hierarchy. For example, it is taken for granted that international excellence encompasses national excellence and (as such) is supposedly more valuable. Inspired by Lin and Law’s discussion of “modes of international” (2013, 2014), we argue in this chapter that gaming metrics, predatory publishing, and exploiting the model of gold open access (Beall, 2012) can be partly understood as a logical response to the imperative of internationalization going wild. It enacts a different, yet dubious, alternative mode of internationalization for those researchers and institutions who fail— for better or worse— within the established mode of international, with its epistemic and economic centers in the global, Anglophone North/West. In this chapter, we zoom in on a recent misconduct case in the Czech Republic to show how the imperative of internationalization and productivity inscribed in the country’s research assessment framework impinges on institutional and individual publication strategies and produces a market for gaming in the academy. 7 Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding Off and Feeding Up the Dominant\",\"PeriodicalId\":186262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaming the Metrics\",\"volume\":\"174 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaming the Metrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaming the Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

欧洲研究政策与研究评价。“国际化”的输入主要体现在对“国际知名度”、“国际影响”或出版场所的国际性赋予了特殊的价值。“国际”在许多层面上被用作比喻:在欧盟资助计划中,在指导国家评估工作的项目目标中,在产出衡量中,在制定机构研究任务中,以及在终身教职标准中。尤其是在荷兰和捷克共和国等较小的国家,国际通常被视为质量的无可置疑的代表,证明了对“学术圈”之外的价值和影响的认可。因此,国际、国家和地方构成了一个明确的规范等级。例如,人们理所当然地认为,国际卓越包括国家卓越,而且(正因为如此)被认为更有价值。受Lin和Law关于“国际化模式”的讨论(2013年,2014年)的启发,我们在本章中认为,游戏参数、掠夺性发行和利用黄金开放获取模式(Beall, 2012年)可以部分理解为对国际化走向疯狂的必然反应。它为那些在既定的国际模式中失败的研究人员和机构制定了一种不同的、但令人怀疑的国际化替代模式——无论好坏——其认知和经济中心位于全球的、以英语为母语的北部/西部。在本章中,我们将聚焦于捷克共和国最近的一个不当行为案例,以展示该国研究评估框架中包含的国际化和生产力的必要性如何影响机构和个人的出版策略,并在学术界产生游戏市场。掠夺性出版和国际生产力的必要性:喂养和喂养主导
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding Off and Feeding Up the Dominant
European research policy and research evaluation. The imports of “internationalization” manifest prominently in how particular value is attached to “international visibility,” “international impact,” or the international character of publication venues. The international is used as a trope on a number of levels: in EU funding schemes, in project goals that guide national assessment exercises, in output measurements, in the formulation of institutional research missions, and in tenuretrack criteria. Especially in smaller countries, such as the Netherlands and the Czech Republic, the international is often taken as an unquestioned proxy for quality, proving recognition of value and impact beyond the “academic pods.” Consequently, the international, the national, and the local constitute a clear normative hierarchy. For example, it is taken for granted that international excellence encompasses national excellence and (as such) is supposedly more valuable. Inspired by Lin and Law’s discussion of “modes of international” (2013, 2014), we argue in this chapter that gaming metrics, predatory publishing, and exploiting the model of gold open access (Beall, 2012) can be partly understood as a logical response to the imperative of internationalization going wild. It enacts a different, yet dubious, alternative mode of internationalization for those researchers and institutions who fail— for better or worse— within the established mode of international, with its epistemic and economic centers in the global, Anglophone North/West. In this chapter, we zoom in on a recent misconduct case in the Czech Republic to show how the imperative of internationalization and productivity inscribed in the country’s research assessment framework impinges on institutional and individual publication strategies and produces a market for gaming in the academy. 7 Predatory Publishing and the Imperative of International Productivity: Feeding Off and Feeding Up the Dominant
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信