艰巨的任务:关于德国史学和记忆中的大屠杀的一些评论

Norbert Frei
{"title":"艰巨的任务:关于德国史学和记忆中的大屠杀的一些评论","authors":"Norbert Frei","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2022.2155379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Germans' awareness of the murder of the European Jews began with the liberation of the concentration camps by the Allies. From there, a complicated history leads, via the judicial confrontation with the crime and the establishment of the new discipline of Zeitgeschichte (contemporary history), to the TV event ‘Holocaust’ (1979), which marked a caesura not only for the German public, but also for historical scholarship. Of great importance was the mere fact that ‘Holocaust’ established a globally understandable term for what in German had until then only been referred to in the language of the perpetrators Endlösung (Final Solution) or Judenvernichtung (extermination of the Jews), or in a metaphorical manner (‘Auschwitz’). The intensified public and historiographical examination of the destruction of the European Jewry that followed ‘Holocaust’ also provoked political and cultural counterforces, and led to heated debates in the 1980s. The term Zivilisationsbruch (breach of civilization) introduced by Dan Diner in the wake of the Historikerstreit (historians’ dispute) marked the singularity of the Jewish genocide and influenced both the development of Holocaust historiography and the evolution of Holocaust memory. The article seeks to explore this impact by going back into the German and European history of research on and remembrance of the fate of the Jews in Europe during World War II – from its beginnings in the late 1940s up to the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust in 2000 and the years thereafter.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"39 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Arduous Affair: Some Remarks About the Holocaust in German Historiography and Memory\",\"authors\":\"Norbert Frei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785648.2022.2155379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Germans' awareness of the murder of the European Jews began with the liberation of the concentration camps by the Allies. From there, a complicated history leads, via the judicial confrontation with the crime and the establishment of the new discipline of Zeitgeschichte (contemporary history), to the TV event ‘Holocaust’ (1979), which marked a caesura not only for the German public, but also for historical scholarship. Of great importance was the mere fact that ‘Holocaust’ established a globally understandable term for what in German had until then only been referred to in the language of the perpetrators Endlösung (Final Solution) or Judenvernichtung (extermination of the Jews), or in a metaphorical manner (‘Auschwitz’). The intensified public and historiographical examination of the destruction of the European Jewry that followed ‘Holocaust’ also provoked political and cultural counterforces, and led to heated debates in the 1980s. The term Zivilisationsbruch (breach of civilization) introduced by Dan Diner in the wake of the Historikerstreit (historians’ dispute) marked the singularity of the Jewish genocide and influenced both the development of Holocaust historiography and the evolution of Holocaust memory. The article seeks to explore this impact by going back into the German and European history of research on and remembrance of the fate of the Jews in Europe during World War II – from its beginnings in the late 1940s up to the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust in 2000 and the years thereafter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"volume\":\"39 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2155379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2022.2155379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国人对屠杀欧洲犹太人的意识始于盟军解放集中营。从那里开始,一段复杂的历史,通过与犯罪的司法对抗和新学科Zeitgeschichte(当代史)的建立,导致了电视事件“大屠杀”(1979年),这不仅标志着德国公众,也标志着历史学者的一个句号。重要的是,“大屠杀”一词建立了一个全球都能理解的术语,在此之前,在德语中,这个术语只在肇事者的语言中被提及Endlösung(最终解决方案)或Judenvernichtung(灭绝犹太人),或者以一种隐喻的方式(“奥斯维辛”)。在“大屠杀”之后,公众和历史学界对欧洲犹太人遭到破坏的调查不断加强,这也引发了政治和文化上的反作用力,并在20世纪80年代引发了激烈的辩论。在历史学家之争之后,丹·迪纳(Dan Diner)提出了“文明的破坏”一词,标志着犹太人种族灭绝的独特性,并影响了大屠杀史学的发展和大屠杀记忆的演变。这篇文章试图通过回顾德国和欧洲在二战期间对欧洲犹太人命运的研究和记忆的历史来探索这种影响——从20世纪40年代末开始,到2000年斯德哥尔摩大屠杀国际论坛以及之后的几年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Arduous Affair: Some Remarks About the Holocaust in German Historiography and Memory
ABSTRACT The Germans' awareness of the murder of the European Jews began with the liberation of the concentration camps by the Allies. From there, a complicated history leads, via the judicial confrontation with the crime and the establishment of the new discipline of Zeitgeschichte (contemporary history), to the TV event ‘Holocaust’ (1979), which marked a caesura not only for the German public, but also for historical scholarship. Of great importance was the mere fact that ‘Holocaust’ established a globally understandable term for what in German had until then only been referred to in the language of the perpetrators Endlösung (Final Solution) or Judenvernichtung (extermination of the Jews), or in a metaphorical manner (‘Auschwitz’). The intensified public and historiographical examination of the destruction of the European Jewry that followed ‘Holocaust’ also provoked political and cultural counterforces, and led to heated debates in the 1980s. The term Zivilisationsbruch (breach of civilization) introduced by Dan Diner in the wake of the Historikerstreit (historians’ dispute) marked the singularity of the Jewish genocide and influenced both the development of Holocaust historiography and the evolution of Holocaust memory. The article seeks to explore this impact by going back into the German and European history of research on and remembrance of the fate of the Jews in Europe during World War II – from its beginnings in the late 1940s up to the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust in 2000 and the years thereafter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信