美元汇率周期使用发达国家和发展中国家的货币和风险因素

Khaled Bataineh
{"title":"美元汇率周期使用发达国家和发展中国家的货币和风险因素","authors":"Khaled Bataineh","doi":"10.56868/jadhur.v1i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper predicts the exchange rates cyclical for US dollar [forecast two states for exchange rates; appreciation and depreciation] through using developing and developed currencies along with two risk factors (TED spreads and Inflation). Probity and logit models along with the principal component analysis and factor analysis are used to retain the most powerful components and factors. The empirical findings reveal that risk factors are not key factors in determining the exchange rates' cyclical behavior for the US dollar. Furthermore, the Sterling Pound is the only variable that has a consistent result that is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate using all types of regressions. In addition, Renminbi shows inconsistent effects between different regressions; using OLS is less likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. By contrast, using Logit and Probit regressions is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. On the other hand, principal component analysis and factor analysis show that for all currencies we should retain two components and factors to be able to explain around 80% of the variation in exchange rate cyclical.","PeriodicalId":248834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USD Exchange Rate Cycles Using Developed and Developing Currencies and Risk Factors\",\"authors\":\"Khaled Bataineh\",\"doi\":\"10.56868/jadhur.v1i1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper predicts the exchange rates cyclical for US dollar [forecast two states for exchange rates; appreciation and depreciation] through using developing and developed currencies along with two risk factors (TED spreads and Inflation). Probity and logit models along with the principal component analysis and factor analysis are used to retain the most powerful components and factors. The empirical findings reveal that risk factors are not key factors in determining the exchange rates' cyclical behavior for the US dollar. Furthermore, the Sterling Pound is the only variable that has a consistent result that is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate using all types of regressions. In addition, Renminbi shows inconsistent effects between different regressions; using OLS is less likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. By contrast, using Logit and Probit regressions is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. On the other hand, principal component analysis and factor analysis show that for all currencies we should retain two components and factors to be able to explain around 80% of the variation in exchange rate cyclical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56868/jadhur.v1i1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56868/jadhur.v1i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对美元汇率周期进行了预测[预测了汇率的两种状态;升值和贬值]通过使用发展中国家和发达国家的货币以及两个风险因素(TED价差和通货膨胀)。诚信和logit模型以及主成分分析和因子分析被用来保留最强大的成分和因素。实证结果表明,风险因素不是决定美元汇率周期性行为的关键因素。此外,英镑是唯一具有一致结果的变量,使用所有类型的回归,英镑更有可能导致美元汇率升值。此外,人民币在不同回归之间表现出不一致的效应;使用OLS导致美元汇率升值的可能性较小。相比之下,使用Logit和Probit回归更有可能导致美元汇率升值。另一方面,主成分分析和因子分析表明,对于所有货币,我们应该保留两个成分和因素,能够解释80%左右的汇率周期性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
USD Exchange Rate Cycles Using Developed and Developing Currencies and Risk Factors
This paper predicts the exchange rates cyclical for US dollar [forecast two states for exchange rates; appreciation and depreciation] through using developing and developed currencies along with two risk factors (TED spreads and Inflation). Probity and logit models along with the principal component analysis and factor analysis are used to retain the most powerful components and factors. The empirical findings reveal that risk factors are not key factors in determining the exchange rates' cyclical behavior for the US dollar. Furthermore, the Sterling Pound is the only variable that has a consistent result that is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate using all types of regressions. In addition, Renminbi shows inconsistent effects between different regressions; using OLS is less likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. By contrast, using Logit and Probit regressions is more likely to cause appreciation for the US dollar exchange rate. On the other hand, principal component analysis and factor analysis show that for all currencies we should retain two components and factors to be able to explain around 80% of the variation in exchange rate cyclical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信