神学方面的巴西严格意义上的学术生产对医院牧师

Anselmo Cordeiro de Souza, Izabel Maria de Oliveira, Jolivê Rodrigues Chaves
{"title":"神学方面的巴西严格意义上的学术生产对医院牧师","authors":"Anselmo Cordeiro de Souza, Izabel Maria de Oliveira, Jolivê Rodrigues Chaves","doi":"10.25194/2317-0573.2021v17n1.e1574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a descriptive approach whose objective is to explain theological models present in academic publications (theses and dissertations). It is not intended to be a systematic analysis or even a hermeneutic-exegetical study, but rather a narrative approach to the theologies present in the consulted material. This is a narrative review of the literature, and the steps for elaboration and organization derived from other studies. It was operationalized according to the following steps: identification of the theme, bibliographic survey, selection of texts, annotations, preliminary structuring and logical structuring of the study. We sought to provide an understanding of current knowledge on the theme “hospital chaplaincy”, highlighting possible gaps and suggesting an agenda of investigations to be undertaken. The TQO strategy (theme, qualifier, object) was used to formulate the research question, which is indicated for narrative reviews, resulting in the issue: which theological models are present in theses and dissertations available in the Brazilian context? The searches were online in the theses and dissertations database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes), carried out in 2020, using the descriptor “chapel*/hospital chaplaincy”, without restrictions on the year of publication or any other. The titles of interest related to the theme were included, in order to answer the proposed question. Data were organized in tables, with qualitative and quantitative summaries. Thirteen productions were retrieved. Among the main results, it is highlighted that approaches of anthropological and praxiological origin prevailed, associated with theological models/concepts such as “imago Dei”, “poimenics” and “theodicy”.","PeriodicalId":286329,"journal":{"name":"PRÁXIS TEOLÓGICA","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THEOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE BRAZILIAN STRICTO SENSU ACADEMIC PRODUCTION ON HOSPITAL CHAPLAINCY\",\"authors\":\"Anselmo Cordeiro de Souza, Izabel Maria de Oliveira, Jolivê Rodrigues Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.25194/2317-0573.2021v17n1.e1574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a descriptive approach whose objective is to explain theological models present in academic publications (theses and dissertations). It is not intended to be a systematic analysis or even a hermeneutic-exegetical study, but rather a narrative approach to the theologies present in the consulted material. This is a narrative review of the literature, and the steps for elaboration and organization derived from other studies. It was operationalized according to the following steps: identification of the theme, bibliographic survey, selection of texts, annotations, preliminary structuring and logical structuring of the study. We sought to provide an understanding of current knowledge on the theme “hospital chaplaincy”, highlighting possible gaps and suggesting an agenda of investigations to be undertaken. The TQO strategy (theme, qualifier, object) was used to formulate the research question, which is indicated for narrative reviews, resulting in the issue: which theological models are present in theses and dissertations available in the Brazilian context? The searches were online in the theses and dissertations database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes), carried out in 2020, using the descriptor “chapel*/hospital chaplaincy”, without restrictions on the year of publication or any other. The titles of interest related to the theme were included, in order to answer the proposed question. Data were organized in tables, with qualitative and quantitative summaries. Thirteen productions were retrieved. Among the main results, it is highlighted that approaches of anthropological and praxiological origin prevailed, associated with theological models/concepts such as “imago Dei”, “poimenics” and “theodicy”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRÁXIS TEOLÓGICA\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRÁXIS TEOLÓGICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25194/2317-0573.2021v17n1.e1574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRÁXIS TEOLÓGICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25194/2317-0573.2021v17n1.e1574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章提出了一个描述性的方法,其目的是解释神学模型目前在学术出版物(论文和学位论文)。它不是一个系统的分析,甚至不是一个解释学-训诂学的研究,而是一种对参考材料中存在的神学的叙述方法。这是对文献的叙述性回顾,以及从其他研究中得到的阐述和组织步骤。按照主题确定、书目调查、文本选择、注释、初步结构和逻辑结构进行研究。我们试图提供关于"医院牧师"主题的现有知识的理解,强调可能存在的差距,并建议开展调查的议程。使用TQO策略(主题、限定词、宾语)来制定研究问题,该问题用于叙事评论,从而产生以下问题:在巴西背景下,论文和学位论文中存在哪些神学模型?这些搜索是在2020年开展的高等教育人员改善协调(Capes)的论文和学位论文数据库中进行的,使用描述符“教堂*/医院牧师”,不受出版年份或其他任何限制。为了回答提议的问题,列入了与主题有关的标题。数据以表格形式组织,并附有定性和定量摘要。检索了13个产品。在主要结果中,强调了人类学和行为学起源的方法占主导地位,与神学模式/概念有关,如“上帝意象”、“神正论”和“神正论”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THEOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE BRAZILIAN STRICTO SENSU ACADEMIC PRODUCTION ON HOSPITAL CHAPLAINCY
This article presents a descriptive approach whose objective is to explain theological models present in academic publications (theses and dissertations). It is not intended to be a systematic analysis or even a hermeneutic-exegetical study, but rather a narrative approach to the theologies present in the consulted material. This is a narrative review of the literature, and the steps for elaboration and organization derived from other studies. It was operationalized according to the following steps: identification of the theme, bibliographic survey, selection of texts, annotations, preliminary structuring and logical structuring of the study. We sought to provide an understanding of current knowledge on the theme “hospital chaplaincy”, highlighting possible gaps and suggesting an agenda of investigations to be undertaken. The TQO strategy (theme, qualifier, object) was used to formulate the research question, which is indicated for narrative reviews, resulting in the issue: which theological models are present in theses and dissertations available in the Brazilian context? The searches were online in the theses and dissertations database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes), carried out in 2020, using the descriptor “chapel*/hospital chaplaincy”, without restrictions on the year of publication or any other. The titles of interest related to the theme were included, in order to answer the proposed question. Data were organized in tables, with qualitative and quantitative summaries. Thirteen productions were retrieved. Among the main results, it is highlighted that approaches of anthropological and praxiological origin prevailed, associated with theological models/concepts such as “imago Dei”, “poimenics” and “theodicy”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信