现代SLAM方法在不同数据集上的功耗比较

Omer Faruk Yanik, H. Ilgin
{"title":"现代SLAM方法在不同数据集上的功耗比较","authors":"Omer Faruk Yanik, H. Ilgin","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI53825.2021.9673342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In autonomous robots, the hardware and the algorithms are limited by the power constraints of the robots. Increasing algorithm efficiency can be considered as a way to deal with power constraints. Considering the processing load of Visual SLAM methods, which are frequently used in autonomous robots and become increasingly widespread, there is a need to investigate the effects of methods on power consumption. In this study, a performance comparison of ORB-SLAM2, which is a feature-based Visual SLAM method, DSO, and LDSO, which are direct Visual SLAM methods was conducted. We perform the comparison on ICL-NUIM, KITTI, and EUROC datasets using NVIDIA Jetson TX1 hardware. Central Processor Unit (CPU) usage, Graphics Processor Unit (GPU) power consumption, and total power consumption were taken into account since hardware and power constraints are very important issue for autonomous systems. Results showed that ORB-SLAM2 is the most efficient method for GPU load and power consumption. GPU power consumption and total power consumption are higher than expected for the DSO method compared to CPU load. The computational cost of Loop-Closure is seen clearly when comparing the DSO and LDSO methods.","PeriodicalId":278263,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Technological Advancements and Innovations (ICTAI)","volume":"488 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Power Consumption of Modern SLAM Methods on Various Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Omer Faruk Yanik, H. Ilgin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI53825.2021.9673342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In autonomous robots, the hardware and the algorithms are limited by the power constraints of the robots. Increasing algorithm efficiency can be considered as a way to deal with power constraints. Considering the processing load of Visual SLAM methods, which are frequently used in autonomous robots and become increasingly widespread, there is a need to investigate the effects of methods on power consumption. In this study, a performance comparison of ORB-SLAM2, which is a feature-based Visual SLAM method, DSO, and LDSO, which are direct Visual SLAM methods was conducted. We perform the comparison on ICL-NUIM, KITTI, and EUROC datasets using NVIDIA Jetson TX1 hardware. Central Processor Unit (CPU) usage, Graphics Processor Unit (GPU) power consumption, and total power consumption were taken into account since hardware and power constraints are very important issue for autonomous systems. Results showed that ORB-SLAM2 is the most efficient method for GPU load and power consumption. GPU power consumption and total power consumption are higher than expected for the DSO method compared to CPU load. The computational cost of Loop-Closure is seen clearly when comparing the DSO and LDSO methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Technological Advancements and Innovations (ICTAI)\",\"volume\":\"488 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Technological Advancements and Innovations (ICTAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI53825.2021.9673342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Technological Advancements and Innovations (ICTAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI53825.2021.9673342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在自主机器人中,硬件和算法受到机器人功率约束的限制。提高算法效率可以被认为是处理功率约束的一种方法。考虑到自动机器人中频繁使用且越来越广泛的视觉SLAM方法的处理负荷,有必要研究这些方法对功耗的影响。本研究对基于特征的视觉SLAM方法ORB-SLAM2与直接的视觉SLAM方法DSO和LDSO进行了性能比较。我们使用NVIDIA Jetson TX1硬件对ICL-NUIM、KITTI和EUROC数据集进行了比较。中央处理器单元(CPU)使用情况、图形处理器单元(GPU)功耗和总功耗都被考虑在内,因为硬件和功耗限制对于自治系统来说是非常重要的问题。结果表明,ORB-SLAM2是最有效的GPU负载和功耗方法。与CPU负载相比,DSO方法的GPU功耗和总功耗高于预期。当比较DSO和LDSO方法时,可以清楚地看到闭环的计算成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Power Consumption of Modern SLAM Methods on Various Datasets
In autonomous robots, the hardware and the algorithms are limited by the power constraints of the robots. Increasing algorithm efficiency can be considered as a way to deal with power constraints. Considering the processing load of Visual SLAM methods, which are frequently used in autonomous robots and become increasingly widespread, there is a need to investigate the effects of methods on power consumption. In this study, a performance comparison of ORB-SLAM2, which is a feature-based Visual SLAM method, DSO, and LDSO, which are direct Visual SLAM methods was conducted. We perform the comparison on ICL-NUIM, KITTI, and EUROC datasets using NVIDIA Jetson TX1 hardware. Central Processor Unit (CPU) usage, Graphics Processor Unit (GPU) power consumption, and total power consumption were taken into account since hardware and power constraints are very important issue for autonomous systems. Results showed that ORB-SLAM2 is the most efficient method for GPU load and power consumption. GPU power consumption and total power consumption are higher than expected for the DSO method compared to CPU load. The computational cost of Loop-Closure is seen clearly when comparing the DSO and LDSO methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信