{"title":"大学生或研究生需要哪些条件才能被录取?职业生涯干预效果的元分析","authors":"Viviana Langher, Valentina Nannini, Andrea Caputo","doi":"10.7358/ECPS-2018-017-LANG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usefulness of providing career interventions in the transition from university to labour market is more and more advocated, in order to increase young people’s competencies about career management and entrepreneurial skills. The present paper aims at focusing on the effectiveness of career interventions for university or graduate students and on its relationship with some study design and intervention characteristics. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2015 which complied with the following inclusion criteria: university or graduate students as target population, the evaluation of specific career-related interventions or programs, and an experimental or quasiexperimental design. The selection procedure resulted in 9 eligible studies – overall assessing 12 interventions – out of 823 examined articles. The results indicated, on average, a large effect (weighted ES = .80; 95% CI = .54, 1.06) better outcomes from socio-constructivist interventions compared to those based on social cognition theory and person-environment fit model, and higher impact on the reduction of career indecision than on the increase of decision-making self-efficacy. Some recommendations for researchers and policy makers are provided, as well as methodological issues and practical implications for career interventions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":175961,"journal":{"name":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Do University or Graduate Students Need to Make the Cut? A Meta-analysis on Career Intervention Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Viviana Langher, Valentina Nannini, Andrea Caputo\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/ECPS-2018-017-LANG\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The usefulness of providing career interventions in the transition from university to labour market is more and more advocated, in order to increase young people’s competencies about career management and entrepreneurial skills. The present paper aims at focusing on the effectiveness of career interventions for university or graduate students and on its relationship with some study design and intervention characteristics. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2015 which complied with the following inclusion criteria: university or graduate students as target population, the evaluation of specific career-related interventions or programs, and an experimental or quasiexperimental design. The selection procedure resulted in 9 eligible studies – overall assessing 12 interventions – out of 823 examined articles. The results indicated, on average, a large effect (weighted ES = .80; 95% CI = .54, 1.06) better outcomes from socio-constructivist interventions compared to those based on social cognition theory and person-environment fit model, and higher impact on the reduction of career indecision than on the increase of decision-making self-efficacy. Some recommendations for researchers and policy makers are provided, as well as methodological issues and practical implications for career interventions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2018-017-LANG\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2018-017-LANG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
越来越多的人提倡在从大学到劳动力市场的过渡中提供职业干预,以提高年轻人在职业管理和创业技能方面的能力。本研究旨在探讨大学生或研究生职业生涯干预的有效性及其与某些研究设计和干预特征的关系。对2000年至2015年间发表的符合以下纳入标准的研究进行了荟萃分析:以大学或研究生为目标人群,评估特定的职业相关干预措施或计划,以及实验或准实验设计。筛选程序从823篇被检查的文章中筛选出9篇符合条件的研究——总体评估了12项干预措施。结果表明,平均而言,影响很大(加权ES = 0.80;(95% CI = 0.54, 1.06)社会建构主义干预比基于社会认知理论和人-环境契合模型的干预效果更好,对减少职业优柔寡断的影响大于对提高决策自我效能的影响。对研究人员和政策制定者提出了一些建议,并讨论了职业干预的方法问题和实际意义。
What Do University or Graduate Students Need to Make the Cut? A Meta-analysis on Career Intervention Effectiveness
The usefulness of providing career interventions in the transition from university to labour market is more and more advocated, in order to increase young people’s competencies about career management and entrepreneurial skills. The present paper aims at focusing on the effectiveness of career interventions for university or graduate students and on its relationship with some study design and intervention characteristics. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies published between 2000 and 2015 which complied with the following inclusion criteria: university or graduate students as target population, the evaluation of specific career-related interventions or programs, and an experimental or quasiexperimental design. The selection procedure resulted in 9 eligible studies – overall assessing 12 interventions – out of 823 examined articles. The results indicated, on average, a large effect (weighted ES = .80; 95% CI = .54, 1.06) better outcomes from socio-constructivist interventions compared to those based on social cognition theory and person-environment fit model, and higher impact on the reduction of career indecision than on the increase of decision-making self-efficacy. Some recommendations for researchers and policy makers are provided, as well as methodological issues and practical implications for career interventions are discussed.