{"title":"导出文化/导入文化","authors":"R. Ousterhout","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190272739.003.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new political entities established in the East during the late tenth through twelfth centuries were heavily indebted to Byzantine culture. Christianized from Constantinople, Kievan Rus’ lacked a building tradition in permanent materials and imported both masons and brick technology from Byzantium. Serbia and Bulgaria had a strong Byzantine presence before securing their independence. While Bulgarian architecture followed closely that of Constantinople, Serbia, connected to Adriatic littoral, blended elements of the Italian Romanesque with Byzantine forms.","PeriodicalId":258635,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Medieval Architecture","volume":"20 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exporting a Culture/ Importing a Culture\",\"authors\":\"R. Ousterhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190272739.003.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new political entities established in the East during the late tenth through twelfth centuries were heavily indebted to Byzantine culture. Christianized from Constantinople, Kievan Rus’ lacked a building tradition in permanent materials and imported both masons and brick technology from Byzantium. Serbia and Bulgaria had a strong Byzantine presence before securing their independence. While Bulgarian architecture followed closely that of Constantinople, Serbia, connected to Adriatic littoral, blended elements of the Italian Romanesque with Byzantine forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eastern Medieval Architecture\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eastern Medieval Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190272739.003.0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Medieval Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190272739.003.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The new political entities established in the East during the late tenth through twelfth centuries were heavily indebted to Byzantine culture. Christianized from Constantinople, Kievan Rus’ lacked a building tradition in permanent materials and imported both masons and brick technology from Byzantium. Serbia and Bulgaria had a strong Byzantine presence before securing their independence. While Bulgarian architecture followed closely that of Constantinople, Serbia, connected to Adriatic littoral, blended elements of the Italian Romanesque with Byzantine forms.