{"title":"卒中管理中的健康素养和健康结果:对现有措施的系统回顾和评价","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.05.02.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low health literacy (HL) increases the risk of adverse stroke-related health outcomes. The aim of this review was to identify 1. what the quality and what the limitations to educational materials used to improve HL in stroke patients are 2. what the levels of HL among stroke patients and stroke survivors are, and 3. how HL and stroke literacy levels affect health-related behaviours and outcomes of stroke patients. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 6 computerized databases and gray literature sources were searched: MEDLINE, OVID, EMBSE, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Google Scholar. Papers published in English between January 01, 2000 and August 01, 2020 were included. Five themes were identified across the 26 studies regarding the education and measurement of stroke with relevance to HL. This review concludes that current instruments used to improve HL in stroke are inadequate as they fail to provide a holistic assessment of health literacy, especially concerning stroke patients and stroke literacy. This review identified a paucity of literature on HL in relation to stroke management and outcomes. Therefore, the authors are in strong favour of future research prioritizing the development of effective tools to assess HL and develop best-practice guidelines for stroke education materials.","PeriodicalId":267360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Stroke Management: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Available Measures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jhss.05.02.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low health literacy (HL) increases the risk of adverse stroke-related health outcomes. The aim of this review was to identify 1. what the quality and what the limitations to educational materials used to improve HL in stroke patients are 2. what the levels of HL among stroke patients and stroke survivors are, and 3. how HL and stroke literacy levels affect health-related behaviours and outcomes of stroke patients. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 6 computerized databases and gray literature sources were searched: MEDLINE, OVID, EMBSE, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Google Scholar. Papers published in English between January 01, 2000 and August 01, 2020 were included. Five themes were identified across the 26 studies regarding the education and measurement of stroke with relevance to HL. This review concludes that current instruments used to improve HL in stroke are inadequate as they fail to provide a holistic assessment of health literacy, especially concerning stroke patients and stroke literacy. This review identified a paucity of literature on HL in relation to stroke management and outcomes. Therefore, the authors are in strong favour of future research prioritizing the development of effective tools to assess HL and develop best-practice guidelines for stroke education materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.05.02.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.05.02.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
低健康素养(HL)增加了卒中相关不良健康结果的风险。本综述的目的是确定1。用于改善脑卒中患者HL的教育材料的质量和局限性是什么?2 .中风患者和中风幸存者的HL水平是多少;HL和卒中扫盲水平如何影响卒中患者的健康相关行为和预后。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。检索了6个计算机数据库和灰色文献来源:MEDLINE、OVID、EMBSE、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、and Health and psychological - psychological Instruments和Google Scholar。收录了2000年1月1日至2020年8月1日期间发表的英文论文。在26项关于与HL相关的卒中教育和测量的研究中确定了5个主题。本综述的结论是,目前用于改善脑卒中HL的工具是不充分的,因为它们不能提供健康素养的整体评估,特别是关于脑卒中患者和脑卒中素养的评估。本综述发现,关于HL与卒中管理和预后相关的文献很少。因此,作者强烈支持未来的研究优先开发有效的工具来评估HL和制定卒中教育材料的最佳实践指南。
Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Stroke Management: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of Available Measures
Low health literacy (HL) increases the risk of adverse stroke-related health outcomes. The aim of this review was to identify 1. what the quality and what the limitations to educational materials used to improve HL in stroke patients are 2. what the levels of HL among stroke patients and stroke survivors are, and 3. how HL and stroke literacy levels affect health-related behaviours and outcomes of stroke patients. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 6 computerized databases and gray literature sources were searched: MEDLINE, OVID, EMBSE, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Google Scholar. Papers published in English between January 01, 2000 and August 01, 2020 were included. Five themes were identified across the 26 studies regarding the education and measurement of stroke with relevance to HL. This review concludes that current instruments used to improve HL in stroke are inadequate as they fail to provide a holistic assessment of health literacy, especially concerning stroke patients and stroke literacy. This review identified a paucity of literature on HL in relation to stroke management and outcomes. Therefore, the authors are in strong favour of future research prioritizing the development of effective tools to assess HL and develop best-practice guidelines for stroke education materials.