ACIR:褒贬不一

S. Gove, J. Giertz, J. Fossett
{"title":"ACIR:褒贬不一","authors":"S. Gove, J. Giertz, J. Fossett","doi":"10.2307/3329919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) has had a long and productive existence. Created in 1959, the Commission has produced a large number of publications that have contributed greatly to our knowledge of intergovernmental relations. It has also made many recommendations. These have received mixed reactions. At times, the recommendations have been seriously considered by Congress and the executive branch. At other times, the recommendations have been ignored. The ACIR says it is \"the first official 'federal' body created since the Constitutional Convention itself. Lacking the action mandate of that great body, the ACIR nevertheless has over the years forged an important agenda as we move into the third century of this vast American experiment.\" Among its many contributions, the most important may well have been the development of the block grant concept. The Commission also played a major role in the debate on revenue sharing. Moreover, it has provided a valuable service with its continuing surveys of the public's view of the federal system. These surveys sometimes tell us things we do not necessarily want to hear (e.g., that the public favors state sales taxes over state income taxes); nonetheless, the information has been invaluable for state policymakers. The Commission's work as illustrated by its publications can be divided into two categories: economic (fiscal) studies and governmental (structural, state and local, and the like) studies. We would similarly like to separate our comments into these two areas.","PeriodicalId":403250,"journal":{"name":"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACIR: A Mixed Review\",\"authors\":\"S. Gove, J. Giertz, J. Fossett\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3329919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) has had a long and productive existence. Created in 1959, the Commission has produced a large number of publications that have contributed greatly to our knowledge of intergovernmental relations. It has also made many recommendations. These have received mixed reactions. At times, the recommendations have been seriously considered by Congress and the executive branch. At other times, the recommendations have been ignored. The ACIR says it is \\\"the first official 'federal' body created since the Constitutional Convention itself. Lacking the action mandate of that great body, the ACIR nevertheless has over the years forged an important agenda as we move into the third century of this vast American experiment.\\\" Among its many contributions, the most important may well have been the development of the block grant concept. The Commission also played a major role in the debate on revenue sharing. Moreover, it has provided a valuable service with its continuing surveys of the public's view of the federal system. These surveys sometimes tell us things we do not necessarily want to hear (e.g., that the public favors state sales taxes over state income taxes); nonetheless, the information has been invaluable for state policymakers. The Commission's work as illustrated by its publications can be divided into two categories: economic (fiscal) studies and governmental (structural, state and local, and the like) studies. We would similarly like to separate our comments into these two areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3329919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3329919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

美国政府间关系咨询委员会(咨委会)有着长期和富有成效的存在。该委员会成立于1959年,出版了大量出版物,极大地促进了我们对政府间关系的了解。它还提出了许多建议。人们对此反应不一。国会和行政部门有时会认真考虑这些建议。在其他时候,这些建议被忽视了。ACIR说,这是“自制宪会议成立以来第一个正式的‘联邦’机构”。尽管缺乏这个伟大机构的行动授权,但在我们进入这个庞大的美国实验的第三个世纪之际,ACIR多年来制定了一个重要的议程。”在它的许多贡献中,最重要的可能是发展了整笔赠款概念。委员会还在关于收入分享的辩论中发挥了重要作用。此外,它还提供了一项有价值的服务,即持续调查公众对联邦制度的看法。这些调查有时会告诉我们一些我们不一定想听到的事情(例如,公众更喜欢州销售税而不是州所得税);尽管如此,这些信息对国家决策者来说是无价的。委员会的出版物所说明的工作可分为两类:经济(财政)研究和政府(结构、州和地方等)研究。我们同样想把我们的意见分为这两个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ACIR: A Mixed Review
The United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) has had a long and productive existence. Created in 1959, the Commission has produced a large number of publications that have contributed greatly to our knowledge of intergovernmental relations. It has also made many recommendations. These have received mixed reactions. At times, the recommendations have been seriously considered by Congress and the executive branch. At other times, the recommendations have been ignored. The ACIR says it is "the first official 'federal' body created since the Constitutional Convention itself. Lacking the action mandate of that great body, the ACIR nevertheless has over the years forged an important agenda as we move into the third century of this vast American experiment." Among its many contributions, the most important may well have been the development of the block grant concept. The Commission also played a major role in the debate on revenue sharing. Moreover, it has provided a valuable service with its continuing surveys of the public's view of the federal system. These surveys sometimes tell us things we do not necessarily want to hear (e.g., that the public favors state sales taxes over state income taxes); nonetheless, the information has been invaluable for state policymakers. The Commission's work as illustrated by its publications can be divided into two categories: economic (fiscal) studies and governmental (structural, state and local, and the like) studies. We would similarly like to separate our comments into these two areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信