慈善契约:福利项目的私有化模式

Sven R. Larson
{"title":"慈善契约:福利项目的私有化模式","authors":"Sven R. Larson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1864850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In public policy discourse, the role of government is not universally accepted, but tends to have widespread support. Most of those who want smaller government with fewer programs accede to the notion that government is here to stay in, e.g., care for the poor. This paper challenges the role of government in core welfare programs. A model is presented for reducing government presence in programs that provide income relief and other support for the poorest citizens. An example from America’s worst-performing state is used to show that this model - called the charity compact - is economically realistic even under significant poverty.","PeriodicalId":316250,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charity Compacts: A Privatization Model for Welfare Programs\",\"authors\":\"Sven R. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1864850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In public policy discourse, the role of government is not universally accepted, but tends to have widespread support. Most of those who want smaller government with fewer programs accede to the notion that government is here to stay in, e.g., care for the poor. This paper challenges the role of government in core welfare programs. A model is presented for reducing government presence in programs that provide income relief and other support for the poorest citizens. An example from America’s worst-performing state is used to show that this model - called the charity compact - is economically realistic even under significant poverty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共政策话语中,政府的作用并没有被普遍接受,但往往得到广泛的支持。大多数想要更小的政府和更少的项目的人都同意这样的观念,即政府是存在的,比如照顾穷人。本文对政府在核心福利项目中的作用提出了挑战。提出了一种减少政府参与为最贫困公民提供收入救济和其他支持的项目的模式。一个来自美国表现最差的州的例子表明,即使在严重贫困的情况下,这种被称为慈善契约的模式在经济上也是现实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Charity Compacts: A Privatization Model for Welfare Programs
In public policy discourse, the role of government is not universally accepted, but tends to have widespread support. Most of those who want smaller government with fewer programs accede to the notion that government is here to stay in, e.g., care for the poor. This paper challenges the role of government in core welfare programs. A model is presented for reducing government presence in programs that provide income relief and other support for the poorest citizens. An example from America’s worst-performing state is used to show that this model - called the charity compact - is economically realistic even under significant poverty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信