covid - 19分类的预训练深度学习模型:cnn与Vision Transformer

Mai Sufian, E. Moung, J. Dargham, Farashazillah Yahya, S. Omatu
{"title":"covid - 19分类的预训练深度学习模型:cnn与Vision Transformer","authors":"Mai Sufian, E. Moung, J. Dargham, Farashazillah Yahya, S. Omatu","doi":"10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fast proliferation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) has pushed many countries' healthcare systems to the brink of disaster. It has become a necessity to automate the screening procedures to reduce the ongoing cost to the healthcare systems. Although the use of the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is gaining attention in the field of COVID19 diagnosis based on medical images, these models have disadvantages due to their image-specific inductive bias, which contradict to the Vision Transformer (ViT). This paper conducts comparative study of the use of the three most established CNN models and a ViT to deal with the classification of COVID19 and Non-COVID19 cases. This study uses 2481 computed tomography (CT) images of 1252 COVID19 and 1229 Non-COVID19 patients. Confusion metrics and performance metrics were used to analyze the models. The experimental results show all the pre-trained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, and IncetionV3)outperformed the pre-trained ViT model, with InceptionV3 as the best performing model (99.20% of accuracy).","PeriodicalId":142482,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-trained Deep Learning Models for COVID19 Classification: CNNs vs. Vision Transformer\",\"authors\":\"Mai Sufian, E. Moung, J. Dargham, Farashazillah Yahya, S. Omatu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fast proliferation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) has pushed many countries' healthcare systems to the brink of disaster. It has become a necessity to automate the screening procedures to reduce the ongoing cost to the healthcare systems. Although the use of the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is gaining attention in the field of COVID19 diagnosis based on medical images, these models have disadvantages due to their image-specific inductive bias, which contradict to the Vision Transformer (ViT). This paper conducts comparative study of the use of the three most established CNN models and a ViT to deal with the classification of COVID19 and Non-COVID19 cases. This study uses 2481 computed tomography (CT) images of 1252 COVID19 and 1229 Non-COVID19 patients. Confusion metrics and performance metrics were used to analyze the models. The experimental results show all the pre-trained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, and IncetionV3)outperformed the pre-trained ViT model, with InceptionV3 as the best performing model (99.20% of accuracy).\",\"PeriodicalId\":142482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICAIET55139.2022.9936852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(covid - 19)的快速扩散已将许多国家的医疗保健系统推向了灾难的边缘。自动化筛查程序以降低医疗系统的持续成本已成为必要。尽管卷积神经网络(cnn)在基于医学图像的covid - 19诊断领域的应用越来越受到关注,但这些模型由于具有图像特异性的归纳偏差而存在与视觉变压器(Vision Transformer, ViT)相矛盾的缺点。本文对使用三种最成熟的CNN模型和ViT来处理covid - 19和非covid - 19病例的分类进行了比较研究。本研究使用了1252例covid - 19和1229例非covid - 19患者的2481张CT图像。使用混淆度量和性能度量来分析模型。实验结果表明,所有预训练的cnn (VGG16、ResNet50和InceptionV3)都优于预训练的ViT模型,其中InceptionV3是表现最好的模型(准确率为99.20%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-trained Deep Learning Models for COVID19 Classification: CNNs vs. Vision Transformer
The fast proliferation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) has pushed many countries' healthcare systems to the brink of disaster. It has become a necessity to automate the screening procedures to reduce the ongoing cost to the healthcare systems. Although the use of the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is gaining attention in the field of COVID19 diagnosis based on medical images, these models have disadvantages due to their image-specific inductive bias, which contradict to the Vision Transformer (ViT). This paper conducts comparative study of the use of the three most established CNN models and a ViT to deal with the classification of COVID19 and Non-COVID19 cases. This study uses 2481 computed tomography (CT) images of 1252 COVID19 and 1229 Non-COVID19 patients. Confusion metrics and performance metrics were used to analyze the models. The experimental results show all the pre-trained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, and IncetionV3)outperformed the pre-trained ViT model, with InceptionV3 as the best performing model (99.20% of accuracy).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信