A. Skrzypczyk
{"title":"Sygnatury tekstowe. Wokół niemieckojęzycznych opowiadań Brunona Schulza","authors":"A. Skrzypczyk","doi":"10.26881/sf.2021.17-18.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article searches for an answer to the question whether the stories might have been written by Bruno Schulz from Drogobych, the one who wrote The Cinnamon Shops. Given that the query has not yet been concluded beyond doubt, she tries to find alternative methods of analyzing these texts. She assumes that young Schulz’s style pattern should not be established by analyzing only his mature texts. Schulz wrote many short stories that could not be found, therefore, the question of his literary identity is still relevant. An account of his literary style can be found in the analysis carried out in the 1970s by Piotr Wróblewski. It allows for finding the most common features that distinguish Schulz from other writers. The distinction is crucial for either confirmation or rejection of authorship. The author conducts an experiment to evaluate the stylistic features in German stories and the result is surprising. In reference to The Cinnamon Shops as well as Schulz’s other well-known other works and his early story “Undula,” his authorship proves certain. However, in the German stories examination yields slightly more than half of the positive responses. The author assumes that in each text there are traces of someone’s individual, unique style, calling them metaphorically “text signatures,” the “fingerprints” of the text. In her research, she also uses methods such as forensic linguistics and stylometry. The author deals with the stereotype of Schulz’s literary debut facilitated by the support of Zofia Nałkowska. In the article, she tries to reconstruct Schulz’s first literary steps and wonders what he might have written between the publication of ”Undula” and “The Birds” (and later The Cinnamon Shops), and whether he included his first literary samples in letters to his friends or during the Kalleia’s meetings in Drogobych. The author lists his lost works and ends the article with the question of Schulz’s identity.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schulz/Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2021.17-18.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的作者正在寻找这个问题的答案,即这些故事是否可能是来自德罗戈比奇的布鲁诺·舒尔茨(Bruno Schulz)写的,也就是《肉桂店》的作者。鉴于这个问题还没有得出毫无疑问的结论,她试图找到分析这些文本的替代方法。她认为年轻的舒尔茨的风格模式不应该只通过分析他成熟的文本来建立。舒尔茨写了许多无法找到的短篇小说,因此,他的文学身份问题仍然是相关的。他的文学风格可以在1970年代Piotr Wróblewski所做的分析中找到。它可以让我们找到舒尔茨与其他作家最共同的特征。这一区别对于确认或拒绝作者身份至关重要。笔者对德语小说的文体特征进行了实验,结果令人惊讶。参考《肉桂店》以及舒尔茨其他著名的作品和他早期的故事《Undula》,他的作者身份证明是肯定的。然而,在德国故事考试中,超过一半的人给出了积极的回答。作者认为,在每一篇文章中都有个人独特风格的痕迹,隐喻地称之为“文本签名”,文本的“指纹”。在她的研究中,她还使用了法律语言学和文体学等方法。在Zofia Nałkowska的支持下,作者探讨了舒尔茨文学处女作的刻板印象。在这篇文章中,她试图重现舒尔茨最初的文学创作,想知道在《乌杜拉》和《鸟》(以及后来的《肉桂店》)出版之间,他可能写了些什么,以及他是否在给朋友的信中,或者在卡莱亚夫妇在德罗戈比奇的会面中,写下了他的第一批文学样本。作者列出了他丢失的作品,并以舒尔茨的身份问题结束了文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sygnatury tekstowe. Wokół niemieckojęzycznych opowiadań Brunona Schulza
The author of the article searches for an answer to the question whether the stories might have been written by Bruno Schulz from Drogobych, the one who wrote The Cinnamon Shops. Given that the query has not yet been concluded beyond doubt, she tries to find alternative methods of analyzing these texts. She assumes that young Schulz’s style pattern should not be established by analyzing only his mature texts. Schulz wrote many short stories that could not be found, therefore, the question of his literary identity is still relevant. An account of his literary style can be found in the analysis carried out in the 1970s by Piotr Wróblewski. It allows for finding the most common features that distinguish Schulz from other writers. The distinction is crucial for either confirmation or rejection of authorship. The author conducts an experiment to evaluate the stylistic features in German stories and the result is surprising. In reference to The Cinnamon Shops as well as Schulz’s other well-known other works and his early story “Undula,” his authorship proves certain. However, in the German stories examination yields slightly more than half of the positive responses. The author assumes that in each text there are traces of someone’s individual, unique style, calling them metaphorically “text signatures,” the “fingerprints” of the text. In her research, she also uses methods such as forensic linguistics and stylometry. The author deals with the stereotype of Schulz’s literary debut facilitated by the support of Zofia Nałkowska. In the article, she tries to reconstruct Schulz’s first literary steps and wonders what he might have written between the publication of ”Undula” and “The Birds” (and later The Cinnamon Shops), and whether he included his first literary samples in letters to his friends or during the Kalleia’s meetings in Drogobych. The author lists his lost works and ends the article with the question of Schulz’s identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信