HLA RTI实现的性能评价

Moritz Gütlein, Wojciech Baron, Christopher Renner, Anatoli Djanatliev
{"title":"HLA RTI实现的性能评价","authors":"Moritz Gütlein, Wojciech Baron, Christopher Renner, Anatoli Djanatliev","doi":"10.1109/DS-RT50469.2020.9213641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The High Level Architecture is an IEEE standard that enables distributed simulation. There are several implementations of the standard, which are providing i.a. the Run-Time Infrastructure component. This paper compares the four most known RTI Implementations, namely MAK RTI, Pitch pRTI, Portico, and CERTI, with a focus on performance evaluation. In general, Pitch pRTI was the fastest implementation for most of our experiments. CERTI performed best for big payload sizes and Portico showed an interesting oscillation pattern.","PeriodicalId":149260,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of HLA RTI Implementations\",\"authors\":\"Moritz Gütlein, Wojciech Baron, Christopher Renner, Anatoli Djanatliev\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DS-RT50469.2020.9213641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The High Level Architecture is an IEEE standard that enables distributed simulation. There are several implementations of the standard, which are providing i.a. the Run-Time Infrastructure component. This paper compares the four most known RTI Implementations, namely MAK RTI, Pitch pRTI, Portico, and CERTI, with a focus on performance evaluation. In general, Pitch pRTI was the fastest implementation for most of our experiments. CERTI performed best for big payload sizes and Portico showed an interesting oscillation pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DS-RT50469.2020.9213641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DS-RT50469.2020.9213641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

高级体系结构是一个IEEE标准,支持分布式仿真。该标准有几种实现,它们在内部提供运行时基础设施组件。本文比较了四种最著名的RTI实现,即MAK RTI, Pitch pRTI, Portico和CERTI,并重点介绍了性能评估。一般来说,在我们的大多数实验中,Pitch pRTI是最快的实现。CERTI在大载荷下表现最好,Portico表现出有趣的振荡模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of HLA RTI Implementations
The High Level Architecture is an IEEE standard that enables distributed simulation. There are several implementations of the standard, which are providing i.a. the Run-Time Infrastructure component. This paper compares the four most known RTI Implementations, namely MAK RTI, Pitch pRTI, Portico, and CERTI, with a focus on performance evaluation. In general, Pitch pRTI was the fastest implementation for most of our experiments. CERTI performed best for big payload sizes and Portico showed an interesting oscillation pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信