社会公平报道:报道计划中的公平问题与一种新的随时公平方法

Martim Brandao
{"title":"社会公平报道:报道计划中的公平问题与一种新的随时公平方法","authors":"Martim Brandao","doi":"10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.","PeriodicalId":156296,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially Fair Coverage: The Fairness Problem in Coverage Planning and a New Anytime-Fair Method\",\"authors\":\"Martim Brandao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在本文中,我们在覆盖路径规划的背景下研究和表征社会公平。受最近关于目标导向规划公平性的工作的启发,以及描述各种人工智能算法不同影响的工作,我们在这里模拟覆盖机器人的部署,以预测公平性问题。我们表明,经典的覆盖算法,特别是那些试图最小化平均等待时间的算法,将存在与社会群体的空间隔离相关的偏差。我们讨论了灾害响应背景下的影响,并提供了一种新的覆盖规划算法,该算法可以最大限度地减少所有时间点的累积不公平。我们表明,我们的算法比现有的进化算法快200倍,同时在多个社会群体的等待时间和覆盖速度差异方面获得了更快的总体覆盖和公平的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socially Fair Coverage: The Fairness Problem in Coverage Planning and a New Anytime-Fair Method
In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信