{"title":"社会公平报道:报道计划中的公平问题与一种新的随时公平方法","authors":"Martim Brandao","doi":"10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.","PeriodicalId":156296,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially Fair Coverage: The Fairness Problem in Coverage Planning and a New Anytime-Fair Method\",\"authors\":\"Martim Brandao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socially Fair Coverage: The Fairness Problem in Coverage Planning and a New Anytime-Fair Method
In this paper we investigate and characterize social fairness in the context of coverage path planning. Inspired by recent work on the fairness of goal-directed planning, and work characterizing the disparate impact of various AI algorithms, here we simulate the deployment of coverage robots to anticipate issues of fairness. We show that classical coverage algorithms, especially those that try to minimize average waiting times, will have biases related to the spatial segregation of social groups. We discuss implications in the context of disaster response, and provide a new coverage planning algorithm that minimizes cumulative unfairness at all points in time. We show that our algorithm is 200 times faster to compute than existing evolutionary algorithms-while obtaining overall-faster coverage and a fair response in terms of waiting-time and coverage-pace differences across multiple social groups.